Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Wed, 21 Aug 2019 09:00:26 +0200
From:   "bigeasy@linutronix.de" <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To:     Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Cc:     "Li, Philip" <philip.li@intel.com>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com>, lkp <lkp@intel.com>,
        "kbuild-all@01.org" <kbuild-all@01.org>,
        "tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        "rostedt@goodmis.org" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        "linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org" <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "williams@redhat.com" <williams@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RT PATCH v2] net/xfrm/xfrm_ipcomp: Protect scratch buffer with
 local_lock
Message-ID: <20190821070026.q24xtcagwwlraany@linutronix.de>
References: <20190819122731.6600-1-juri.lelli@redhat.com>
 <201908201356.Pffozrxv%lkp@intel.com>
 <20190820064203.GB6860@localhost.localdomain>
 <831EE4E5E37DCC428EB295A351E66249520CA35E@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com>
 <20190821064422.GE6860@localhost.localdomain>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190821064422.GE6860@localhost.localdomain>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 2019-08-21 08:44:22 [+0200], Juri Lelli wrote:
> > Hi Juri, currently if the mail subject has RFC, we will test it but send report
> > privately to author only.
> 
> OK. But, my email had "RT" and not "RFC" in the subject (since it is
> meant for one of the PREEMPT_RT stable trees [1]).

Was the RT tag consider at all at some point? I remember I asked for it
and then the bot did not complain again or I don't remember. At the same
point my rt-devel tree was added to the trees-to-be-tested.

> Best,
> 
> Juri
> 
> 1 - git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rt/linux-stable-rt.git v4.19-rt

Sebastian