Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932234AbVLPMeT (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Dec 2005 07:34:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932230AbVLPMeT (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Dec 2005 07:34:19 -0500 Received: from ms-smtp-01.nyroc.rr.com ([24.24.2.55]:42369 "EHLO ms-smtp-01.nyroc.rr.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932223AbVLPMeS (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Dec 2005 07:34:18 -0500 Subject: Re: 2.6.15-rc5-rt2 slowness From: Steven Rostedt To: G.Ohrner@post.rwth-aachen.de Cc: Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 07:34:07 -0500 Message-Id: <1134736447.13138.122.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 885 Lines: 23 On Fri, 2005-12-16 at 12:42 +0100, Gunter Ohrner wrote: > Gunter Ohrner wrote: > > the other is a high system load and bad responsiveness of the system as a > > whole. I didn't even bother to measure timer/sleep jitters as the system > > was dog slow and the fans started to run a full speed nearly immediately. > > Ok, I recompiled the kernel with some debug options and attached > a /proc/latency_trace output, hoping it will be helpful to track down the > problem... > > Please tell me if there's anything else I should do. Sorry, your latency trace doesn't help. The 45usec is not really a latency (well not a bad one). -- Steve - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/