Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751304AbVLPPfm (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Dec 2005 10:35:42 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751303AbVLPPfl (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Dec 2005 10:35:41 -0500 Received: from srvr5.engin.umich.edu ([141.213.75.23]:60361 "EHLO srvr5.engin.umich.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751301AbVLPPfe (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Dec 2005 10:35:34 -0500 From: Matt Reuther Organization: The Knights Who Say... Ni! To: LKML Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] i386: always use 4k stacks Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 10:36:58 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200512161036.59333.mreuther@umich.edu> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 601 Lines: 11 Isn't this patch specifically for the -mm kernel and not mainline? How can anyone using a binary driver provide any feedback on an -mm kernel? The binary driver taints the kernel, so bug reports are useless. Furthermore, if you aren't interested in debugging the kernel, why would you run the -mm tree or why can't you hack/patch the 8k stacks back in? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/