Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1564970604-10044-1-git-send-email-wanpengli@tencent.com>
 <9acbc733-442f-0f65-9b56-ff800a3fa0f5@redhat.com> <CANRm+CwH54S555nw-Zik-3NFDH9yqe+SOZrGc3mPoAU_qGxP-A@mail.gmail.com>
 <e7b84893-42bf-e80e-61c9-ef5d1b200064@redhat.com> <CANRm+CzJf9Or_45frTe9ivFx9QDfx6Nou7uLT6tm1NmcPKDn8A@mail.gmail.com>
 <728bf051-02eb-8fe8-042f-9893f23b4a68@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <728bf051-02eb-8fe8-042f-9893f23b4a68@redhat.com>
From:   Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 22 Aug 2019 16:45:13 +0800
Message-ID: <CANRm+CwaMDhiCvHX7eL4fL6bcPYd76yYPVL2uuiuKTVW6ZZP4w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/6] KVM: Fix leak vCPU's VMCS value into other pCPU
To:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
        =?UTF-8?B?UmFkaW0gS3LEjW3DocWZ?= <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
        Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
        Marc Zyngier <Marc.Zyngier@arm.com>,
        "# v3 . 10+" <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, 22 Aug 2019 at 16:35, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On 22/08/19 02:46, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> > On Tue, 6 Aug 2019 at 14:20, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 06/08/19 02:35, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> >>> Thank you, Paolo! Btw, how about other 5 patches?
> >>
> >> Queued everything else too.
> >
> > How about patch 4/6~5/6, they are not in kvm/queue. :)
>
> I queued 4.
>
> For patch 5, I don't really see the benefit since the hypercall
> arguments are already traced.

Agreed, thank you.

Regards,
Wanpeng Li