Received: by 2002:a25:8b12:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i18csp1038698ybl; Thu, 22 Aug 2019 08:29:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwkCG+cctqb6m5tR7P3UJCTSpX72SGoKNheUETdiYTrSxn9m060kfMrmgwHUo0XWR5T1Zs2 X-Received: by 2002:a63:5550:: with SMTP id f16mr35692938pgm.426.1566487749057; Thu, 22 Aug 2019 08:29:09 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1566487749; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=vtJkIL5w+jodJ2+Gn6z2f8AJP6qs+rDk9UC5YEerhvKrZOtrGl9b31W8c1tAxtqi1V L2Q8ymeyPAKsAAde7sueyyCbKRWjSTg9t8WkOB6d4l2wXs8gojE5SnUq+S6leoO2ouZl pB8eFepJY6XCDSO8pnCkpw3+WQqE/kKqJ9FZHE1/uIBRM3Eda+2Naques+fHPx/Ncjz4 fz1Ntm1tMDwS87GLtEOF13TfT4GNpNUagOXkQ5mBlyr40Qsw1dEeq/yY1lgT/p393TAe t3o6NY5IlSf7h3LJDrTX+MPTR2Y/7JSjb1WZVJNPDbTXmOEbsC9PhRN3qC0rSrkn9xMn GQnQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=BYa6tjL2V3XaMoQE3BhKW3UPDRomuHKgIfVfgHeXWkk=; b=EMLJ2985YxpYXLCnZ/hKQSTd4XwxeDWQxQzRIfL5h57hrJiQDyqFJvwr/oDWudO2QJ 7mYOM5O/xuegyWhvWLSuptNzxZWyoBTaGm8jrnfT/98Ura7RBKMafNp5/uOf832buTum 5RaEfXlaOt4+Ckax0nFiaBaTO5k5n6HNHUxGfyM1z0W1vniLziwd+wWsTiI5/rBFdjuh HxRs9Axw1SNYcARgZqlZzhA1i2XVxmVe5JeQ2PV/RI/JWUBnYWSvuE/1y/edkh/GHnbg Ulcgy7a6ObpbfGw1qtXhCXRVgNqP4g3w1Df4lqeZD6gVCxCbiiqn4XfprrD0/gThaZCc kY6Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@brainfault-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=SLoyt31s; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id e33si17647110pld.436.2019.08.22.08.28.54; Thu, 22 Aug 2019 08:29:09 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@brainfault-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=SLoyt31s; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732385AbfHVOBB (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 22 Aug 2019 10:01:01 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-f68.google.com ([209.85.128.68]:50376 "EHLO mail-wm1-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726096AbfHVOBB (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Aug 2019 10:01:01 -0400 Received: by mail-wm1-f68.google.com with SMTP id v15so5767535wml.0 for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2019 07:00:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=brainfault-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=BYa6tjL2V3XaMoQE3BhKW3UPDRomuHKgIfVfgHeXWkk=; b=SLoyt31scpRwxQBpNMLbyMa2/JRzuZ/BvQpsmqigUavDoqB3UBrVcOQ2zNbgB93tJY 7gmE1ESkIu45NoMKahMGZ6mucJ2K0ER3t14M60WH5wltnZNqZy/sR52AK5Og1ZxvPafC tpatC5C8yYAPSjBPnPPx5L52ONkg0uwedvI/Np7gQqHMvV6taKwsQGI+x4yyHTjrFdOY xGqn79jRZheK7D9l85xO+Jaje7akWcupNQ8OX9Lkftj5kSsriFrZHMdgLwbwY2IQn3VP 3k2MDSqvA3TE7le83FB3i3F1gvmxdh1xyTyIAbRxwaUSnoz4kGwz+gbxZIf6TwqrMOyP roWA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=BYa6tjL2V3XaMoQE3BhKW3UPDRomuHKgIfVfgHeXWkk=; b=Lu6CfYisKxARRpq63M46imDJzMPSCtVcFnghszW7ZRRYF6hnkfUjnSh9TeotF1kzjh 3fia6/BCrNt1LgzW8o/+k/HP+4xQe1yKjmp3LTcNluTp0iXfXESoa34edM6C/Wt38ftP YS7jN5iysrNviKhM1orgb8RT82RMfm8/al6yrsu0dE6+o6nS9eOPODeXwpmVO6G+/3CD eLcFjqM0wFkJTS2FrrSx1Lu0r4f328nZmhdD123KszkLVc6VnlU/J4HmX6qvsccAjLFB vJRYBxqS7aVt1pHeOxZ0a41S6uONnXNLU9y4tj9TegmYL09qCYXnndGLhvH1qRKlLHXc oRTA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVDhXPPBidWgorvIlrOuSM3rRGRQc6ffcG+qJyajKjYMefyT7Tq B5VrjgRDDkTwiXr4+K1WKwpIz0WxqcW3PVnxNEhAYw== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:c909:: with SMTP id f9mr6776316wmb.52.1566482456476; Thu, 22 Aug 2019 07:00:56 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190822084131.114764-1-anup.patel@wdc.com> <20190822084131.114764-9-anup.patel@wdc.com> In-Reply-To: From: Anup Patel Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2019 19:30:45 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 08/20] RISC-V: KVM: Implement KVM_GET_ONE_REG/KVM_SET_ONE_REG ioctls To: Alexander Graf Cc: Anup Patel , Palmer Dabbelt , Paul Walmsley , Paolo Bonzini , Radim K , Daniel Lezcano , Thomas Gleixner , Atish Patra , Alistair Francis , Damien Le Moal , Christoph Hellwig , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 5:31 PM Alexander Graf wrote: > > On 22.08.19 10:44, Anup Patel wrote: > > For KVM RISC-V, we use KVM_GET_ONE_REG/KVM_SET_ONE_REG ioctls to access > > VCPU config and registers from user-space. > > > > We have three types of VCPU registers: > > 1. CONFIG - these are VCPU config and capabilities > > 2. CORE - these are VCPU general purpose registers > > 3. CSR - these are VCPU control and status registers > > > > The CONFIG registers available to user-space are ISA and TIMEBASE. Out > > of these, TIMEBASE is a read-only register which inform user-space about > > VCPU timer base frequency. The ISA register is a read and write register > > where user-space can only write the desired VCPU ISA capabilities before > > running the VCPU. > > > > The CORE registers available to user-space are PC, RA, SP, GP, TP, A0-A7, > > T0-T6, S0-S11 and MODE. Most of these are RISC-V general registers except > > PC and MODE. The PC register represents program counter whereas the MODE > > register represent VCPU privilege mode (i.e. S/U-mode). > > > > The CSRs available to user-space are SSTATUS, SIE, STVEC, SSCRATCH, SEPC, > > SCAUSE, STVAL, SIP, and SATP. All of these are read/write registers. > > > > In future, more VCPU register types will be added (such as FP) for the > > KVM_GET_ONE_REG/KVM_SET_ONE_REG ioctls. > > > > Signed-off-by: Anup Patel > > Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini > > Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini > > --- > > arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h | 40 ++++- > > arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu.c | 235 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > > 2 files changed, 272 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h > > index 6dbc056d58ba..024f220eb17e 100644 > > --- a/arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h > > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h > > @@ -23,8 +23,15 @@ > > > > /* for KVM_GET_REGS and KVM_SET_REGS */ > > struct kvm_regs { > > + /* out (KVM_GET_REGS) / in (KVM_SET_REGS) */ > > + struct user_regs_struct regs; > > + unsigned long mode; > > Is there any particular reason you're reusing kvm_regs and don't invent > your own struct? kvm_regs is explicitly meant for the get_regs and > set_regs ioctls. We are implementing only ONE_REG interface so most of these structs are unused hence we tried to reuse these struct instead of introducing new structs. (Similar to KVM ARM64) > > > }; > > > > +/* Possible privilege modes for kvm_regs */ > > +#define KVM_RISCV_MODE_S 1 > > +#define KVM_RISCV_MODE_U 0 > > + > > /* for KVM_GET_FPU and KVM_SET_FPU */ > > struct kvm_fpu { > > }; > > @@ -41,10 +48,41 @@ struct kvm_guest_debug_arch { > > struct kvm_sync_regs { > > }; > > > > -/* dummy definition */ > > +/* for KVM_GET_SREGS and KVM_SET_SREGS */ > > struct kvm_sregs { > > + unsigned long sstatus; > > + unsigned long sie; > > + unsigned long stvec; > > + unsigned long sscratch; > > + unsigned long sepc; > > + unsigned long scause; > > + unsigned long stval; > > + unsigned long sip; > > + unsigned long satp; > > Same comment here. Same as above, we are trying to use unused struct. > > > }; > > > > +#define KVM_REG_SIZE(id) \ > > + (1U << (((id) & KVM_REG_SIZE_MASK) >> KVM_REG_SIZE_SHIFT)) > > + > > +/* If you need to interpret the index values, here is the key: */ > > +#define KVM_REG_RISCV_TYPE_MASK 0x00000000FF000000 > > +#define KVM_REG_RISCV_TYPE_SHIFT 24 > > + > > +/* Config registers are mapped as type 1 */ > > +#define KVM_REG_RISCV_CONFIG (0x01 << KVM_REG_RISCV_TYPE_SHIFT) > > +#define KVM_REG_RISCV_CONFIG_ISA 0x0 > > +#define KVM_REG_RISCV_CONFIG_TIMEBASE 0x1 > > + > > +/* Core registers are mapped as type 2 */ > > +#define KVM_REG_RISCV_CORE (0x02 << KVM_REG_RISCV_TYPE_SHIFT) > > +#define KVM_REG_RISCV_CORE_REG(name) \ > > + (offsetof(struct kvm_regs, name) / sizeof(unsigned long)) > > I see, you're trying to implicitly use the struct offsets as index. > > I'm not a really big fan of it, but I can't pinpoint exactly why just > yet. It just seems too magical (read: potentially breaking down the > road) for me. > > > + > > +/* Control and status registers are mapped as type 3 */ > > +#define KVM_REG_RISCV_CSR (0x03 << KVM_REG_RISCV_TYPE_SHIFT) > > +#define KVM_REG_RISCV_CSR_REG(name) \ > > + (offsetof(struct kvm_sregs, name) / sizeof(unsigned long)) > > + > > #endif > > > > #endif /* __LINUX_KVM_RISCV_H */ > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu.c b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu.c > > index 7f59e85c6af8..9396a83c0611 100644 > > --- a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu.c > > +++ b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu.c > > @@ -164,6 +164,215 @@ vm_fault_t kvm_arch_vcpu_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vm_fault *vmf) > > return VM_FAULT_SIGBUS; > > } > > > > +static int kvm_riscv_vcpu_get_reg_config(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, > > + const struct kvm_one_reg *reg) > > +{ > > + unsigned long __user *uaddr = > > + (unsigned long __user *)(unsigned long)reg->addr; > > + unsigned long reg_num = reg->id & ~(KVM_REG_ARCH_MASK | > > + KVM_REG_SIZE_MASK | > > + KVM_REG_RISCV_CONFIG); > > + unsigned long reg_val; > > + > > + if (KVM_REG_SIZE(reg->id) != sizeof(unsigned long)) > > + return -EINVAL; > > + > > + switch (reg_num) { > > + case KVM_REG_RISCV_CONFIG_ISA: > > + reg_val = vcpu->arch.isa; > > + break; > > + case KVM_REG_RISCV_CONFIG_TIMEBASE: > > + reg_val = riscv_timebase; > > What does this reflect? The current guest time hopefully not? An offset? > Related to what? riscv_timebase is the frequency in HZ of the system timer. The name "timebase" is not appropriate but we have been carrying it since quite some time now. > > All ONE_REG registers should be documented in > Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt. Please add them there. Sure, I will update in next revision. > > > + break; > > + default: > > + return -EINVAL; > > + }; > > + > > + if (copy_to_user(uaddr, ®_val, KVM_REG_SIZE(reg->id))) > > + return -EFAULT; > > + > > + return 0; > > +} > > + > > +static int kvm_riscv_vcpu_set_reg_config(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, > > + const struct kvm_one_reg *reg) > > +{ > > + unsigned long __user *uaddr = > > + (unsigned long __user *)(unsigned long)reg->addr; > > + unsigned long reg_num = reg->id & ~(KVM_REG_ARCH_MASK | > > + KVM_REG_SIZE_MASK | > > + KVM_REG_RISCV_CONFIG); > > + unsigned long reg_val; > > + > > + if (KVM_REG_SIZE(reg->id) != sizeof(unsigned long)) > > + return -EINVAL; > > + > > + if (copy_from_user(®_val, uaddr, KVM_REG_SIZE(reg->id))) > > + return -EFAULT; > > + > > + switch (reg_num) { > > + case KVM_REG_RISCV_CONFIG_ISA: > > + if (!vcpu->arch.ran_atleast_once) { > > + vcpu->arch.isa = reg_val; > > + vcpu->arch.isa &= riscv_isa_extension_base(NULL); > > + vcpu->arch.isa &= KVM_RISCV_ISA_ALLOWED; > > This register definitely needs proper documentation too ;). You may want > to reconsider to put a few of the helper bits from patch 02/20 into > uapi, so that user space can directly use them. Sure, I will add details about ISA register in Documentation/virt/kvm/api.txt Regards, Anup > > > + } else { > > + return -ENOTSUPP; > > + } > > + break; > > + case KVM_REG_RISCV_CONFIG_TIMEBASE: > > + return -ENOTSUPP; > > + default: > > + return -EINVAL; > > + }; > > + > > + return 0; > > +} > > + > > +static int kvm_riscv_vcpu_get_reg_core(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, > > + const struct kvm_one_reg *reg) > > +{ > > + struct kvm_cpu_context *cntx = &vcpu->arch.guest_context; > > + unsigned long __user *uaddr = > > + (unsigned long __user *)(unsigned long)reg->addr; > > + unsigned long reg_num = reg->id & ~(KVM_REG_ARCH_MASK | > > + KVM_REG_SIZE_MASK | > > + KVM_REG_RISCV_CORE); > > + unsigned long reg_val; > > + > > + if (KVM_REG_SIZE(reg->id) != sizeof(unsigned long)) > > + return -EINVAL; > > + > > + if (reg_num == KVM_REG_RISCV_CORE_REG(regs.pc)) > > + reg_val = cntx->sepc; > > + else if (KVM_REG_RISCV_CORE_REG(regs.pc) < reg_num && > > + reg_num <= KVM_REG_RISCV_CORE_REG(regs.t6)) > > + reg_val = ((unsigned long *)cntx)[reg_num]; > > + else if (reg_num == KVM_REG_RISCV_CORE_REG(mode)) > > + reg_val = (cntx->sstatus & SR_SPP) ? > > + KVM_RISCV_MODE_S : KVM_RISCV_MODE_U; > > + else > > + return -EINVAL; > > + > > + if (copy_to_user(uaddr, ®_val, KVM_REG_SIZE(reg->id))) > > + return -EFAULT; > > + > > + return 0; > > +} > > + > > +static int kvm_riscv_vcpu_set_reg_core(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, > > + const struct kvm_one_reg *reg) > > +{ > > + struct kvm_cpu_context *cntx = &vcpu->arch.guest_context; > > + unsigned long __user *uaddr = > > + (unsigned long __user *)(unsigned long)reg->addr; > > + unsigned long reg_num = reg->id & ~(KVM_REG_ARCH_MASK | > > + KVM_REG_SIZE_MASK | > > + KVM_REG_RISCV_CORE); > > + unsigned long reg_val; > > + > > + if (KVM_REG_SIZE(reg->id) != sizeof(unsigned long)) > > + return -EINVAL; > > + > > + if (copy_from_user(®_val, uaddr, KVM_REG_SIZE(reg->id))) > > + return -EFAULT; > > + > > + if (reg_num == KVM_REG_RISCV_CORE_REG(regs.pc)) > > + cntx->sepc = reg_val; > > + else if (KVM_REG_RISCV_CORE_REG(regs.pc) < reg_num && > > + reg_num <= KVM_REG_RISCV_CORE_REG(regs.t6)) > > + ((unsigned long *)cntx)[reg_num] = reg_val; > > + else if (reg_num == KVM_REG_RISCV_CORE_REG(mode)) { > > + if (reg_val == KVM_RISCV_MODE_S) > > + cntx->sstatus |= SR_SPP; > > + else > > + cntx->sstatus &= ~SR_SPP; > > + } else > > + return -EINVAL; > > + > > + return 0; > > +} > > + > > +static int kvm_riscv_vcpu_get_reg_csr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, > > + const struct kvm_one_reg *reg) > > +{ > > + struct kvm_vcpu_csr *csr = &vcpu->arch.guest_csr; > > + unsigned long __user *uaddr = > > + (unsigned long __user *)(unsigned long)reg->addr; > > + unsigned long reg_num = reg->id & ~(KVM_REG_ARCH_MASK | > > + KVM_REG_SIZE_MASK | > > + KVM_REG_RISCV_CSR); > > + unsigned long reg_val; > > + > > + if (KVM_REG_SIZE(reg->id) != sizeof(unsigned long)) > > + return -EINVAL; > > + if (reg_num >= sizeof(struct kvm_sregs) / sizeof(unsigned long)) > > + return -EINVAL; > > + > > + if (reg_num == KVM_REG_RISCV_CSR_REG(sip)) > > + kvm_riscv_vcpu_flush_interrupts(vcpu); > > + > > + reg_val = ((unsigned long *)csr)[reg_num]; > > + > > + if (copy_to_user(uaddr, ®_val, KVM_REG_SIZE(reg->id))) > > + return -EFAULT; > > + > > + return 0; > > +} > > + > > +static int kvm_riscv_vcpu_set_reg_csr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, > > + const struct kvm_one_reg *reg) > > +{ > > + struct kvm_vcpu_csr *csr = &vcpu->arch.guest_csr; > > + unsigned long __user *uaddr = > > + (unsigned long __user *)(unsigned long)reg->addr; > > + unsigned long reg_num = reg->id & ~(KVM_REG_ARCH_MASK | > > + KVM_REG_SIZE_MASK | > > + KVM_REG_RISCV_CSR); > > + unsigned long reg_val; > > + > > + if (KVM_REG_SIZE(reg->id) != sizeof(unsigned long)) > > + return -EINVAL; > > + if (reg_num >= sizeof(struct kvm_sregs) / sizeof(unsigned long)) > > + return -EINVAL; > > + > > + if (copy_from_user(®_val, uaddr, KVM_REG_SIZE(reg->id))) > > + return -EFAULT; > > + > > + ((unsigned long *)csr)[reg_num] = reg_val; > > + > > + if (reg_num == KVM_REG_RISCV_CSR_REG(sip)) > > + WRITE_ONCE(vcpu->arch.irqs_pending_mask, 0); > > Why does writing SIP clear all pending interrupts? > > > Alex