Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751339AbVLPUW5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Dec 2005 15:22:57 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751347AbVLPUW5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Dec 2005 15:22:57 -0500 Received: from omx3-ext.sgi.com ([192.48.171.25]:49618 "EHLO omx3.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751339AbVLPUW4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Dec 2005 15:22:56 -0500 Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 12:22:37 -0800 From: Paul Jackson To: paulmck@us.ibm.com Cc: akpm@osdl.org, dada1@cosmosbay.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, Simon.Derr@bull.net, ak@suse.de, clameter@sgi.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/04] Cpuset: use rcu directly optimization Message-Id: <20051216122237.e29d3cb0.pj@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <20051216175540.GB24876@us.ibm.com> References: <20051214084031.21054.13829.sendpatchset@jackhammer.engr.sgi.com> <20051214084037.21054.4269.sendpatchset@jackhammer.engr.sgi.com> <20051216175540.GB24876@us.ibm.com> Organization: SGI X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.1.7 (GTK+ 2.4.9; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 574 Lines: 18 Paul wrote: > Looks good to me from an RCU perspective! Thanks for looking at it. > Moving from synchronize_rcu() to call_rcu() would be tricky, Yes, likely so. -- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson 1.925.600.0401 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/