Received: by 2002:a25:8b12:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i18csp1259546ybl; Thu, 22 Aug 2019 11:44:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxkhqmBfO1WMC0RaUWncX/X0CphV7RvHnLGKzig/scyBKx2kDC/oS9CrrWCvMQfMRXXHP4q X-Received: by 2002:aa7:90d4:: with SMTP id k20mr663331pfk.78.1566499484174; Thu, 22 Aug 2019 11:44:44 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1566499484; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=zH9lo4i///cP8vsPBwymCZqXsaB1F9BXZzUphaY/YRA6Wa59uR8MT5oBKgyMOEMgQF fP+qwwRmYcBuxW0wZDEYueNZgzUC6pLbYSQ0ClHmV3xd1D/0c3+SkcJnfnzkGVuZav2W 7o/tOrT/B2PGB7aWpPbzO1z1HgnFChtQltsmy4fSbpigOHHhL6iHxFn6wkVIZmTP16Ng fF0fkORhPIcS5xtiYRoaFBPwPJY99Yji47mK4LWwbRUc2/kIfJjhV8wLnQAex/5FUi2d PtwN8OJxf82Fi/W7mB+f5O3LFb8+7HVIty0InZ28hzuKHkZiktMTm8GA3PvygkmzdrPe 4smg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=owcOoEp6aNnkjdtdYDHsmLCi8NvcAgea7t+o4S8rkeE=; b=R+7GVDFf/jlhYnsMWi9NmgOYLHEc1y8Sf9sUWW6du+UeSUj6Tod/karoLJ2X2R60gO VPyPRsdomvbuwRNx7g/WSOQEGmDkq2FiQNFjMSn8WlZQ4c7Rh8YdF/NsVFgYAlK/g+iU mjgSxWZvqkTq083tLJPkKR9JU6f5EqVOk31BG+k+WMHE+qkXB2F0De27MtC4iyunK5w0 NnCAJPVB8Rb1Hkd5QmLBTaDHtV1vQ2DB/cnsvSb6siTqE18/794em2HJW7vZCgIIdltL 8jUzx8saloZTz0mR8MC3nFGv4KXAZuR965ali30ZJ2D5DSjJjS6vS5UL+VUsgT68H/a1 moxw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@amazon.com header.s=amazon201209 header.b=nNYOHsAu; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=QUARANTINE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=amazon.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id q16si365859pfl.234.2019.08.22.11.44.29; Thu, 22 Aug 2019 11:44:44 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@amazon.com header.s=amazon201209 header.b=nNYOHsAu; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=QUARANTINE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=amazon.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2389009AbfHVN1Z (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 22 Aug 2019 09:27:25 -0400 Received: from smtp-fw-4101.amazon.com ([72.21.198.25]:9896 "EHLO smtp-fw-4101.amazon.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730723AbfHVN1Y (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Aug 2019 09:27:24 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=amazon.com; i=@amazon.com; q=dns/txt; s=amazon201209; t=1566480442; x=1598016442; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=owcOoEp6aNnkjdtdYDHsmLCi8NvcAgea7t+o4S8rkeE=; b=nNYOHsAutH5YJ0+PQgD1Bt1S1ZKfrzvlWHEPk64TmHRdeNI6e5GSdqW+ vACxugj40pYmqU2tfd6ovp+Ewm7CU5pTdEMqyWop05JWIJQOI6vuNiej+ DyKfdRb6kx75fJY8e7dUym0xXajb+mDypsl/q30srW6oamRdcdwxYshJn Q=; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.64,416,1559520000"; d="scan'208";a="780765678" Received: from iad6-co-svc-p1-lb1-vlan3.amazon.com (HELO email-inbound-relay-2c-87a10be6.us-west-2.amazon.com) ([10.124.125.6]) by smtp-border-fw-out-4101.iad4.amazon.com with ESMTP; 22 Aug 2019 13:27:20 +0000 Received: from EX13MTAUWC001.ant.amazon.com (pdx4-ws-svc-p6-lb7-vlan2.pdx.amazon.com [10.170.41.162]) by email-inbound-relay-2c-87a10be6.us-west-2.amazon.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2016A2725; Thu, 22 Aug 2019 13:27:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from EX13D20UWC001.ant.amazon.com (10.43.162.244) by EX13MTAUWC001.ant.amazon.com (10.43.162.135) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1367.3; Thu, 22 Aug 2019 13:27:19 +0000 Received: from 38f9d3867b82.ant.amazon.com (10.43.160.167) by EX13D20UWC001.ant.amazon.com (10.43.162.244) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1367.3; Thu, 22 Aug 2019 13:27:14 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 13/20] RISC-V: KVM: Implement stage2 page table programming To: Anup Patel CC: Anup Patel , Palmer Dabbelt , "Paul Walmsley" , Paolo Bonzini , Radim K , Daniel Lezcano , Thomas Gleixner , Atish Patra , Alistair Francis , Damien Le Moal , Christoph Hellwig , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" References: <20190822084131.114764-1-anup.patel@wdc.com> <20190822084131.114764-14-anup.patel@wdc.com> <77b9ff3c-292f-ee17-ddbb-134c0666fde7@amazon.com> From: Alexander Graf Message-ID: Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2019 15:27:12 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.43.160.167] X-ClientProxiedBy: EX13D25UWB004.ant.amazon.com (10.43.161.180) To EX13D20UWC001.ant.amazon.com (10.43.162.244) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 22.08.19 14:38, Anup Patel wrote: > On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 5:58 PM Alexander Graf wrote: >> >> On 22.08.19 10:45, Anup Patel wrote: >>> This patch implements all required functions for programming >>> the stage2 page table for each Guest/VM. >>> >>> At high-level, the flow of stage2 related functions is similar >>> from KVM ARM/ARM64 implementation but the stage2 page table >>> format is quite different for KVM RISC-V. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Anup Patel >>> Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini >>> Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini >>> --- >>> arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 10 + >>> arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable-bits.h | 1 + >>> arch/riscv/kvm/mmu.c | 637 +++++++++++++++++++++++++- >>> 3 files changed, 638 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_host.h >>> index 3b09158f80f2..a37775c92586 100644 >>> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_host.h >>> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_host.h >>> @@ -72,6 +72,13 @@ struct kvm_mmio_decode { >>> int shift; >>> }; >>> >>> +#define KVM_MMU_PAGE_CACHE_NR_OBJS 32 >>> + >>> +struct kvm_mmu_page_cache { >>> + int nobjs; >>> + void *objects[KVM_MMU_PAGE_CACHE_NR_OBJS]; >>> +}; >>> + >>> struct kvm_cpu_context { >>> unsigned long zero; >>> unsigned long ra; >>> @@ -163,6 +170,9 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch { >>> /* MMIO instruction details */ >>> struct kvm_mmio_decode mmio_decode; >>> >>> + /* Cache pages needed to program page tables with spinlock held */ >>> + struct kvm_mmu_page_cache mmu_page_cache; >>> + >>> /* VCPU power-off state */ >>> bool power_off; >>> >>> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable-bits.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable-bits.h >>> index bbaeb5d35842..be49d62fcc2b 100644 >>> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable-bits.h >>> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable-bits.h >>> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ >>> >>> #define _PAGE_SPECIAL _PAGE_SOFT >>> #define _PAGE_TABLE _PAGE_PRESENT >>> +#define _PAGE_LEAF (_PAGE_READ | _PAGE_WRITE | _PAGE_EXEC) >>> >>> /* >>> * _PAGE_PROT_NONE is set on not-present pages (and ignored by the hardware) to >>> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/riscv/kvm/mmu.c >>> index 2b965f9aac07..9e95ab6769f6 100644 >>> --- a/arch/riscv/kvm/mmu.c >>> +++ b/arch/riscv/kvm/mmu.c >>> @@ -18,6 +18,432 @@ >>> #include >>> #include >>> >>> +#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT >>> +#define stage2_have_pmd true >>> +#define stage2_gpa_size ((phys_addr_t)(1ULL << 39)) >>> +#define stage2_cache_min_pages 2 >>> +#else >>> +#define pmd_index(x) 0 >>> +#define pfn_pmd(x, y) ({ pmd_t __x = { 0 }; __x; }) >>> +#define stage2_have_pmd false >>> +#define stage2_gpa_size ((phys_addr_t)(1ULL << 32)) >>> +#define stage2_cache_min_pages 1 >>> +#endif >>> + >>> +static int stage2_cache_topup(struct kvm_mmu_page_cache *pcache, >>> + int min, int max) >>> +{ >>> + void *page; >>> + >>> + BUG_ON(max > KVM_MMU_PAGE_CACHE_NR_OBJS); >>> + if (pcache->nobjs >= min) >>> + return 0; >>> + while (pcache->nobjs < max) { >>> + page = (void *)__get_free_page(GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO); >>> + if (!page) >>> + return -ENOMEM; >>> + pcache->objects[pcache->nobjs++] = page; >>> + } >>> + >>> + return 0; >>> +} >>> + >>> +static void stage2_cache_flush(struct kvm_mmu_page_cache *pcache) >>> +{ >>> + while (pcache && pcache->nobjs) >>> + free_page((unsigned long)pcache->objects[--pcache->nobjs]); >>> +} >>> + >>> +static void *stage2_cache_alloc(struct kvm_mmu_page_cache *pcache) >>> +{ >>> + void *p; >>> + >>> + if (!pcache) >>> + return NULL; >>> + >>> + BUG_ON(!pcache->nobjs); >>> + p = pcache->objects[--pcache->nobjs]; >>> + >>> + return p; >>> +} >>> + >>> +struct local_guest_tlb_info { >>> + struct kvm_vmid *vmid; >>> + gpa_t addr; >>> +}; >>> + >>> +static void local_guest_tlb_flush_vmid_gpa(void *info) >>> +{ >>> + struct local_guest_tlb_info *infop = info; >>> + >>> + __kvm_riscv_hfence_gvma_vmid_gpa(READ_ONCE(infop->vmid->vmid_version), >>> + infop->addr); >>> +} >>> + >>> +static void stage2_remote_tlb_flush(struct kvm *kvm, gpa_t addr) >>> +{ >>> + struct local_guest_tlb_info info; >>> + struct kvm_vmid *vmid = &kvm->arch.vmid; >>> + >>> + /* TODO: This should be SBI call */ >>> + info.vmid = vmid; >>> + info.addr = addr; >>> + preempt_disable(); >>> + smp_call_function_many(cpu_all_mask, local_guest_tlb_flush_vmid_gpa, >>> + &info, true); >> >> This is all nice and dandy on the toy 4 core systems we have today, but >> it will become a bottleneck further down the road. >> >> How many VMIDs do you have? Could you just allocate a new one every time >> you switch host CPUs? Then you know exactly which CPUs to flush by >> looking at all your vcpu structs and a local field that tells you which >> pCPU they're on at this moment. >> >> Either way, it's nothing that should block inclusion. For today, we're fine. > > We are not happy about this either. > > Other two options, we have are: > 1. Have SBI calls for remote HFENCEs > 2. Propose RISC-V ISA extension for remote FENCEs > > Option1 is mostly extending SBI spec and implementing it in runtime > firmware. > > Option2 is ideal solution but requires consensus among wider audience > in RISC-V foundation. > > At this point, we are fine with a simple solution. It's fine to explicitly IPI other CPUs to flush their TLBs. What is not fine is to IPI *all* CPUs to flush their TLBs. Alex