Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 10 Nov 2000 16:10:36 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 10 Nov 2000 16:10:26 -0500 Received: from ryouko.dgim.crc.ca ([142.92.39.75]:50609 "EHLO ryouko.dgim.crc.ca") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 10 Nov 2000 16:10:14 -0500 Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2000 16:09:11 -0500 (EST) From: "William F. Maton" Reply-To: wmaton@ryouko.dgim.crc.ca To: "Jeff V. Merkey" cc: Andrea Arcangeli , "Richard B. Johnson" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [Fwd: sendmail fails to deliver mail with attachments in /var/spool/mqueue] In-Reply-To: <3A0C5A41.16EEAE78@timpanogas.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 10 Nov 2000, Jeff V. Merkey wrote: > Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > > > > On Fri, Nov 10, 2000 at 03:07:46PM -0500, Richard B. Johnson wrote: > > > It isn't a TCP/IP stack problem. It may be a memory problem. Every time > > > sendmail spawns a child to send the file data, it crashes. That's > > > why the file never gets sent! > > > > Sure that could be the case. You should be able to verify the kernel kills the > > task with `dmesg`. > > > > However Jeff said the problem happens over 400K and a 500K attachment shouldn't > > really run any machine out of memory, so maybe this wasn't his same problem? > > I think it is. So it looks like sendmail is bombing when it attempts to > send large files. Not to use the 'S-word', but we're receiving/sending biggish attachments (7MB-9MB) under Solaris 2.6. Could sendmail be triggering a linux bug, or could something specific to linux be triggering a sendmail bug? > Jeff wfms - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/