Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Add NETIF_F_HW_BRIDGE feature
To:     Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>,
        roopa@cumulusnetworks.com, davem@davemloft.net,
        UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com, alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com,
        allan.nielsen@microchip.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org
References: <1566500850-6247-1-git-send-email-horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
From:   Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com>
Message-ID: <1e16da88-08c5-abd5-0a3e-b8e6c3db134a@cumulusnetworks.com>
Date:   Fri, 23 Aug 2019 01:09:50 +0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1566500850-6247-1-git-send-email-horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 22/08/2019 22:07, Horatiu Vultur wrote:
> Current implementation of the SW bridge is setting the interfaces in
> promisc mode when they are added to bridge if learning of the frames is
> enabled.
> In case of Ocelot which has HW capabilities to switch frames, it is not
> needed to set the ports in promisc mode because the HW already capable of
> doing that. Therefore add NETIF_F_HW_BRIDGE feature to indicate that the
> HW has bridge capabilities. Therefore the SW bridge doesn't need to set
> the ports in promisc mode to do the switching.
> This optimization takes places only if all the interfaces that are part
> of the bridge have this flag and have the same network driver.
> 
> If the bridge interfaces is added in promisc mode then also the ports part
> of the bridge are set in promisc mode.
> 
> Horatiu Vultur (3):
>   net: Add HW_BRIDGE offload feature
>   net: mscc: Use NETIF_F_HW_BRIDGE
>   net: mscc: Implement promisc mode.
> 
>  drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  include/linux/netdev_features.h    |  3 +++
>  net/bridge/br_if.c                 | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  net/core/ethtool.c                 |  1 +
>  4 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 

IMO the name is misleading.
Why do the devices have to be from the same driver ? This is too specific targeting some
devices. The bridge should not care what's the port device, it should be the other way
around, so adding device-specific code to the bridge is not ok. Isn't there a solution
where you can use NETDEV_JOIN and handle it all from your driver ?
Would all HW-learned entries be hidden from user-space in this case ?