Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Fri, 23 Aug 2019 18:32:32 +0200
From:   Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To:     "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
Cc:     Scott Wood <swood@redhat.com>, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
        Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RT v2 3/3] rcu: Disable use_softirq on PREEMPT_RT
Message-ID: <20190823163232.zvs3gdcf2sxffbg5@linutronix.de>
References: <20190821231906.4224-1-swood@redhat.com>
 <20190821231906.4224-4-swood@redhat.com>
 <20190821234018.GW28441@linux.ibm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
In-Reply-To: <20190821234018.GW28441@linux.ibm.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 2019-08-21 16:40:18 [-0700], Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> Save a couple of lines?
> 
> static bool use_softirq = !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL);
> 
> And if I understand your point above, the module_param() might be
> able to be the same either way given the new RCU.  But if not,
> at least we get rid of the #else.

I *think* we wanted this. And while I took the RCU patches for v5.2 I
forgot to enable it by default…

> 							Thanx, Paul

Sebastian