Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Sat, 24 Aug 2019 17:33:48 +0200
From:   Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To:     shuah <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc:     Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
        akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net,
        patches@kernelci.org, ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk,
        lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.2 000/135] 5.2.10-stable review
Message-ID: <20190824153348.GA27505@kroah.com>
References: <20190822170811.13303-1-sashal@kernel.org>
 <00216731-a088-7d47-eafb-70409f876bda@kernel.org>
 <20190824023829.GE9862@kroah.com>
 <e4d5ba59-8e38-a267-8a14-3c6bc03f77bd@kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <e4d5ba59-8e38-a267-8a14-3c6bc03f77bd@kernel.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 09:21:53AM -0600, shuah wrote:
> On 8/23/19 8:38 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 12:41:03PM -0600, shuah wrote:
> > > On 8/22/19 11:05 AM, Sasha Levin wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.2.10 release.
> > > > There are 135 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > > let me know.
> > > > 
> > > > Responses should be made by Sat 24 Aug 2019 05:07:10 PM UTC.
> > > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > > > 
> > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > > >           https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-5.2.10-rc1.gz
> > > 
> > > I am seeing "Sorry I can't find your kernels". Is this posted?
> > 
> > Ah, Sasha didn't generate the patch but it was still listed here, oops.
> > He copied my format and we didn't notice this, sorry about that.
> > 
> > As the thread shows, we didn't generate this file this time to see what
> > would happen.  If your test process requires it, we can generate it as I
> > don't want to break it.
> > 
> 
> It will make it lot easier for me to have continued support for patch
> generation. My scripts do "wget" to pull the patch and apply.

Ok, we will get this back and working, sorry about that.

greg k-h