DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=MG8JGbsGBg7DflykgyE8lN5QEVCgnPiT5yOJZYRsM55zkZLLin/xYBd+ALToJYWtZQ2EZe2Tg1JQ420Vum4JUaPOvATPcPTWck1AKoZgsLn95R8Z+x1/3RoD7Rr487LAoSw1PH6tqb7hMRp1Y6vrU/xPYBTma99nfVZuMoAHltQ=
Message-ID: <758a2bbf0512171759i35df21e7t8a1b00f72c362614@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 17:59:13 -0800
From: Vijay Sampath <vsampath@gmail.com>
To: gcoady@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MTD (kernel 2.4.32): kernel stuck in tight loop occasionally on flash access
In-Reply-To: <02DAE179D5CEED4C992055C823ED90FF8ACE8E@ex1>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <02DAE179D5CEED4C992055C823ED90FF8ACE8E@ex1>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 754
Lines: 20

>         Leaves me confused :)  Description and patch should match?

Description has a typo. Patch is accurate. Unless somebody more
knowledgeable than me on the intricacies would want to differ.

>         Something is wrong here?  Your patch should not alter dontdiff.

It didn't. 2.4 kernel doesn't have dontdiff, so I had to download it.
But I only downloaded to one of the directories, hence the messed up
output. Maybe dontdiff should have "dontdiff" as one of the files not
to diff! :)

Thanks,

Vijay
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/