Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965117AbVLRP0Z (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Dec 2005 10:26:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965135AbVLRP0Z (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Dec 2005 10:26:25 -0500 Received: from ms-smtp-01.nyroc.rr.com ([24.24.2.55]:232 "EHLO ms-smtp-01.nyroc.rr.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965117AbVLRP0Y (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Dec 2005 10:26:24 -0500 Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 10:26:14 -0500 (EST) From: Steven Rostedt X-X-Sender: rostedt@gandalf.stny.rr.com To: Pavel Machek cc: Ingo Molnar , acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, len.brown@intel.com, Andrew Morton , Fernando Lopez-Lezcano , Lee Revell , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Paul E. McKenney" , "K.R. Foley" , Thomas Gleixner , pluto@agmk.net, john cooper , Benedikt Spranger , Daniel Walker , Tom Rini , George Anzinger Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Runtime switching of the idle function [take 2] In-Reply-To: <20051129130843.GA9991@openzaurus.ucw.cz> Message-ID: References: <1132336954.20672.11.camel@cmn3.stanford.edu> <1132350882.6874.23.camel@mindpipe> <1132351533.4735.37.camel@cmn3.stanford.edu> <20051118220755.GA3029@elte.hu> <1132353689.4735.43.camel@cmn3.stanford.edu> <1132367947.5706.11.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20051124150731.GD2717@elte.hu> <1132952191.24417.14.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20051126130548.GA6503@elte.hu> <1133232503.6328.18.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20051129130843.GA9991@openzaurus.ucw.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1032 Lines: 30 On Tue, 29 Nov 2005, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > Description: > > > > This patch creates a directory in /sys/kernel called idle. This > > directory contains two files: idle_ctrl and idle_methods. Reading > > idle_ctrl will show the function that is currently being used for idle, > > and idle_methods shows the available methods for the user to send write > > into idle_ctrl to change which function to use for idle. > > Pretty ugly interface, I'd say... is listing function really neccessary? > What interface would you prefer? And the listing was a feature request made by Ingo. But this is pretty much moot, since the patch is not going any further than the RT patch. And even then, it probably is only temporary, if it is even still in there (I haven't checked). --Steve - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/