Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20190820031952.14804-1-andrew.smirnov@gmail.com> <20190824191148.GD16308@X250.getinternet.no>
In-Reply-To: <20190824191148.GD16308@X250.getinternet.no>
From:   Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 26 Aug 2019 11:03:47 -0700
Message-ID: <CAHQ1cqGy_Cyw2rdC9hGvvr+2ke+KGy2ZExNfeJL9MW5oH9efTQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: vf610-zii-dev-rev-b: Drop redundant I2C properties
To:     Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
Cc:     linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        Chris Healy <cphealy@gmail.com>,
        Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 12:12 PM Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 08:19:52PM -0700, Andrey Smirnov wrote:
> > Drop redundant I2C properties that are already specified in
> > vf610-zii-dev.dtsi
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@gmail.com>
> > Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
> > Cc: Chris Healy <cphealy@gmail.com>
> > Cc: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>
> > Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> > ---
> >  arch/arm/boot/dts/vf610-zii-dev-rev-b.dts | 10 ----------
> >  1 file changed, 10 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/vf610-zii-dev-rev-b.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/vf610-zii-dev-rev-b.dts
> > index 48086c5e8549..e500911ce0a5 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/vf610-zii-dev-rev-b.dts
> > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/vf610-zii-dev-rev-b.dts
> > @@ -323,11 +323,6 @@
> >  };
> >
> >  &i2c0 {
> > -     clock-frequency = <100000>;
> > -     pinctrl-names = "default";
> > -     pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_i2c0>;
>
> pinctrl for i2c0 is not same as what vf610-zii-dev.dtsi has.

The only difference I can see is in pinctrl-names so I am assuming
that's what you mean. Not configuring I2C recovery on Rev B board was
not intentional. I'll update commit log in v2.

Thanks,
Andrey Smirnov