Received: by 2002:a25:8b12:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i18csp5230800ybl; Tue, 27 Aug 2019 01:12:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxmF1is8VEBG5l6T4B2Y+yPAi3j+Jn//BTZlnlS4uyhlB2MYAwBDZPCYMXi/kCRJuB8GhMN X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:d207:: with SMTP id t7mr20773595ply.305.1566893528753; Tue, 27 Aug 2019 01:12:08 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1566893528; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=jD1fV68wNvaCD1E5xMO9x7HZizLzg5sLHMi9D2qmRfmzLt3NrVT1yqfn6zAn2YDFok nhWKj2sTTMXRk7YbRXI0a3tb95cXQnGi7zq1I3LobJDkiYEHm7adrCNWRvA/hUubIbi/ djOUTGYixGzSq9HZxMTyRJSJRaqWS9xQW5kkQyORnRaNselHpgoyN0lLCeCRWeIjRZyR jlL8bAT/ZMiutnEeFoWXgYO5EfULoGSVD8zBUtEytp+XNJfFJVIEpJxV4Q7On3rwLZ0C xjBhRFtEPaKInbuHCdd5eFL5ytd7sfU2Mw/efqTgndECpmtcHVVrzvz4fRSfOr1UfC3d dJIA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to :from:dkim-signature; bh=lcW69gmWsYZlmcWjLlu9+CnxL0m/vRD+s8bB2Gmt+SE=; b=xZf3W+4wKolDmYdI+7LC49YczX5vYP2J9GBihBJ5un9sc1Ih9FXuXJc/7Yv3h8E3py I3XS8i7q7WYB90oVwS02dKJ+4V0KPL/Ar3kACHuYPlAPhOueNQVZc12QZd5WWRTyDaSl 3pDVdw1yzkVlIY0zDjYkcoJ8789wzeGR24MaEjDTxEfm0YdoRTrIjihaRbM45EEsT09K i99XjG+6KpqSGxehVM9LnDSUwx70npzWAhSucPSfhyL7rBqcEWjkKKTFk4qgaKAdgV6G xNC8naTAjHfVMfkacRUqNzjIqcADEIbGdyINymfSYIC6lmlPYWkzT7+V9/vPgLyJ2cZR G2Kg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b="UgHkAb/Q"; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f189si12380602pfa.283.2019.08.27.01.11.53; Tue, 27 Aug 2019 01:12:08 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b="UgHkAb/Q"; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732165AbfH0IDA (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 27 Aug 2019 04:03:00 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:60254 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1732105AbfH0IC5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Aug 2019 04:02:57 -0400 Received: from localhost (83-86-89-107.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 826D6206BA; Tue, 27 Aug 2019 08:02:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1566892977; bh=BQJJ7V0TFi5l6Xs2+GGf5LTmUXearB8vYzqzeyd7hmU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=UgHkAb/QoqHDdHGp7HQU3OJ3wXx7wCIWjxMg4+zenLeGrJ9G3Gp/kuWIDVx8xkt+A NxSzRH5lLqYfOC0SDLm7jSCCEOH8i/wFMIqvDuf2OVpY5lZ2k1aDkuCpR+iv/xjr5X HZXnSYxhRnS7viX6MVlVDHv4HLfyHy1iLhRxAGjM= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Pavel Shilovsky , Ronnie Sahlberg , Steve French , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 5.2 080/162] SMB3: Fix potential memory leak when processing compound chain Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2019 09:50:08 +0200 Message-Id: <20190827072740.898571657@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.23.0 In-Reply-To: <20190827072738.093683223@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20190827072738.093683223@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.66 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org [ Upstream commit 3edeb4a4146dc3b54d6fa71b7ee0585cb52ebfdf ] When a reconnect happens in the middle of processing a compound chain the code leaks a buffer from the memory pool. Fix this by properly checking for a return code and freeing buffers in case of error. Also maintain a buf variable to be equal to either smallbuf or bigbuf depending on a response buffer size while parsing a chain and when returning to the caller. Signed-off-by: Pavel Shilovsky Reviewed-by: Ronnie Sahlberg Signed-off-by: Steve French Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- fs/cifs/smb2ops.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/cifs/smb2ops.c b/fs/cifs/smb2ops.c index 2ec37dc589a7b..ae10d6e297c3a 100644 --- a/fs/cifs/smb2ops.c +++ b/fs/cifs/smb2ops.c @@ -4015,7 +4015,6 @@ receive_encrypted_standard(struct TCP_Server_Info *server, { int ret, length; char *buf = server->smallbuf; - char *tmpbuf; struct smb2_sync_hdr *shdr; unsigned int pdu_length = server->pdu_size; unsigned int buf_size; @@ -4045,18 +4044,15 @@ receive_encrypted_standard(struct TCP_Server_Info *server, return length; next_is_large = server->large_buf; - one_more: +one_more: shdr = (struct smb2_sync_hdr *)buf; if (shdr->NextCommand) { - if (next_is_large) { - tmpbuf = server->bigbuf; + if (next_is_large) next_buffer = (char *)cifs_buf_get(); - } else { - tmpbuf = server->smallbuf; + else next_buffer = (char *)cifs_small_buf_get(); - } memcpy(next_buffer, - tmpbuf + le32_to_cpu(shdr->NextCommand), + buf + le32_to_cpu(shdr->NextCommand), pdu_length - le32_to_cpu(shdr->NextCommand)); } @@ -4085,12 +4081,21 @@ receive_encrypted_standard(struct TCP_Server_Info *server, pdu_length -= le32_to_cpu(shdr->NextCommand); server->large_buf = next_is_large; if (next_is_large) - server->bigbuf = next_buffer; + server->bigbuf = buf = next_buffer; else - server->smallbuf = next_buffer; - - buf += le32_to_cpu(shdr->NextCommand); + server->smallbuf = buf = next_buffer; goto one_more; + } else if (ret != 0) { + /* + * ret != 0 here means that we didn't get to handle_mid() thus + * server->smallbuf and server->bigbuf are still valid. We need + * to free next_buffer because it is not going to be used + * anywhere. + */ + if (next_is_large) + free_rsp_buf(CIFS_LARGE_BUFFER, next_buffer); + else + free_rsp_buf(CIFS_SMALL_BUFFER, next_buffer); } return ret; -- 2.20.1