Received: by 2002:a25:8b12:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i18csp5570364ybl; Tue, 27 Aug 2019 06:43:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyQnJ24j2IMrrIiZ6j1L3Uf3Hjljn6MhxJyxgeOjrsR7PMF+fLy04YHJd2gn4o1r7tz6Mqg X-Received: by 2002:aa7:8dc9:: with SMTP id j9mr19883423pfr.233.1566913383325; Tue, 27 Aug 2019 06:43:03 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1566913383; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=WAhwnQcojHZ3RYKMtnyCDpV0TSKwcDlgCE+cZGSkDfsS9z9123F7teCtN3xxcg5MFR p4uAXsHffdNeiU3E944YBNcbZQ9ycgNVDDqJ1JVsVItsKL7Nhmy1GrA95VJakqmHp13Z MR+q19zWAgMRc5unJBJ/ZjCBayPH2BFtDwrs9soNJrtHSuMuAA05PKy+s50HVDu1YTdV S905bpSNTB7+dP58ll5mtAe57czVRcuRjXH5Q+WOQT8O/kQ1NKxFcebSgO/1llAr7K5J NhQ2wVXJXTGykC9TVNBNkGroEZaxOvZbyOKIMnFU9mfa1Wwp/VoDmXoG4SynV0AJScpT gD1w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:organization:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=WT7mnzJvfP/z1Dmx6/7ZkQauDZusdeuEPnd9qSijAbA=; b=XCPglsUf2LfutDuoCKSWEh82fnoFZ2P/FkcgPiknhiB3BSX1uQEvITjtZmQafD8IFf PyHjRGNaA8nDUNVB46qwNNeRJFLvBQgRcI/UHABr+xrsxm6QbGnpnMiwWQlOWfY3HHvY ZLR+zDbEKmQ6z6C+oAX1xmdiBbk161nmxv5EthuSomd8tb9MkoTzRw2EMb5EVc3v57AZ 8MF0s5KL4VTLfX71tstnWKQqo51ssspj/v5R7oZDB3xHXt4zBD8WPmWBPhXL1ZumBVEv fDfT/oKFOZb8ajMjB1Q8mEfvihvil9LDUP3a+qg9trbfr3uRIgOakObGAsQ+qTe5TpsQ pCfQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a18si11971221pfn.138.2019.08.27.06.42.47; Tue, 27 Aug 2019 06:43:03 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727633AbfH0Nl7 (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 27 Aug 2019 09:41:59 -0400 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:64187 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725811AbfH0Nl6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Aug 2019 09:41:58 -0400 X-Amp-Result: UNKNOWN X-Amp-Original-Verdict: FILE UNKNOWN X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga004.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.48]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 27 Aug 2019 06:41:57 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.64,437,1559545200"; d="scan'208";a="204973364" Received: from jsakkine-mobl1.fi.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.237.66.169]) by fmsmga004.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 27 Aug 2019 06:41:55 -0700 Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2019 16:41:55 +0300 From: Jarkko Sakkinen To: Matthew Garrett , ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org Cc: Peter Jones , Roberto Sassu , Bartosz Szczepanek , Lyude Paul , linux-efi , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] efi+tpm: Don't access event->count when it isn't mapped. Message-ID: <20190827134155.otm6ekeb53siy6lb@linux.intel.com> References: <20190826153028.32639-1-pjones@redhat.com> <20190826162823.4mxkwhd7mbtro3zy@linux.intel.com> <20190827110344.4uvjppmkkaeex3mk@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190827110344.4uvjppmkkaeex3mk@linux.intel.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 02:03:44PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > Jarkko, these two should probably go to 5.3 if possible - I > > independently had a report of a system hitting this issue last week > > (Intel apparently put a surprising amount of data in the event logs on > > the NUCs). > > OK, I can try to push them. I'll do PR today. Ard, how do you wish these to be managed? I'm asking this because: 1. Neither patch was CC'd to linux-integrity. 2. Neither patch has your tags ATM. /Jarkko