Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964774AbVLSPYp (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Dec 2005 10:24:45 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964775AbVLSPYp (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Dec 2005 10:24:45 -0500 Received: from [212.76.85.191] ([212.76.85.191]:33799 "EHLO raad.intranet") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964774AbVLSPYp (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Dec 2005 10:24:45 -0500 From: Al Boldi To: Helge Hafting Subject: Re: Linux in a binary world... a doomsday scenario Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 18:19:53 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 Cc: Nick Piggin , Arjan van de Ven , Greg KH , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200512150013.29549.a1426z@gawab.com> <200512152129.01861.a1426z@gawab.com> <43A6920A.2080409@aitel.hist.no> In-Reply-To: <43A6920A.2080409@aitel.hist.no> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200512191819.53938.a1426z@gawab.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1362 Lines: 36 Helge Hafting wrote: > Al Boldi wrote: > >Scalability is more, much more. It's about extendability and reusability > >built on a solid foundation that may be stacked. > > Again: Code reuse is nice, or even necessary, with a limited and > expensive workforce. It is not a concern with an unlimited free > workforce though. If some volunteer makes an improvement by > doing a big rewrite - well, the job gets done and nobody have to > pay him. This works. And you can't > get they guy to do something you find more useful "instead". Maintainers > can refuse patches of course - this usually cause people to work less > on linux rather than working more efficiently on linux. So even > a "lot of work for only a little gain" type patch is taken, if it is > technically sound. Because the time couldn't be better spent anyway, > so it wasn't wasted. > > >Layers upon layers, the > >sky is the limit. Stability is the key to unlock this scalability. > > I consider too many stacked layers inefficient. Keep it simple . . . True. But they are necessary to reach higher grounds. Think about it. Thanks! -- Al - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/