Received: by 2002:a25:8b12:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i18csp5942653ybl; Tue, 27 Aug 2019 11:58:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzfzTBkMfJTd8t64rnhC9Jh7D++Ls6vZqFLCvs5yWhiVNIdtcJ/+q5m0weJnol3wwALTEO6 X-Received: by 2002:a62:7e11:: with SMTP id z17mr27019052pfc.211.1566932296720; Tue, 27 Aug 2019 11:58:16 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1566932296; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=nwTTvIcm7hR2kPu512y3+rJRJL9gP9ySXOKBa2Ecjsp3D+frkUVrURBIAVPT+eO3Xd EHEIAeoCGXDYXXwGg7Q4C5gwpcz8ywavJc3I2rmMzffBuzIIINSqBK/GI/nwQExQmoSj GjBBdn8zVrSFB+4dPsN2ZFHbDmusE2hj3YjUAdsbgddNCE54XiyXCNnfzDubj/3h6GET SnNRrqgUvJacyrLW7Y1wsA8xSlCV2HCfBJ9z8/INzh6BGadv6+d099ZU9Lum/r/Za/C/ l1W5ySpvoxNUUIb+jUA6yxyk22cZGkyGyRmuzoQo4riZnobWWcJ05CPWpRiXgU+LKSoB QpbA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=kfMEzYrpUfTY0i3m21REaC+jEYUl5NOuebNc2z99RmU=; b=gOULmIJ5oavP1ZcuU+CmBXKv+xF3pMb/PLM8zbP/+uBb+2QZY4YmaRv6tekzHOiSc5 hs4SeiGfXNoYxC9NioGCCGirl7moZhiXyve1zUkZ7JieYd8oA0KFQy3Knre2lqyxMmlB ECGDifq9t78wF79UbYZaj/Zuzo0ADV9KpWcsREI2IzPVsAQnk3IlLEpzlX2rft+iHmtw y5Tnfab/WulETKolBi+VWiHC1UgmcVuQoHZpV65MZmNafG19t0QDrOIEPVbt4qx5eR+E 3C1rbw7sjbipovJg4YnCE11Mghd2txuDeoNYaJ5GbNhERG/Q3p2Shx9UcPiYqnEEytOQ NHaA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id g32si173967pje.65.2019.08.27.11.58.00; Tue, 27 Aug 2019 11:58:16 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730940AbfH0S4i (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 27 Aug 2019 14:56:38 -0400 Received: from iolanthe.rowland.org ([192.131.102.54]:40400 "HELO iolanthe.rowland.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1730486AbfH0S4i (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Aug 2019 14:56:38 -0400 Received: (qmail 1525 invoked by uid 2102); 27 Aug 2019 14:56:36 -0400 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 27 Aug 2019 14:56:36 -0400 Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2019 14:56:36 -0400 (EDT) From: Alan Stern X-X-Sender: stern@iolanthe.rowland.org To: Kai-Heng Feng cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] USB: storage: ums-realtek: Whitelist auto-delink support In-Reply-To: <20190827173450.13572-2-kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 28 Aug 2019, Kai-Heng Feng wrote: > Auto-delink requires writing special registers to ums-realtek devices. > Unconditionally enable auto-delink may break newer devices. > > So only enable auto-delink by default for the original three IDs, > 0x0138, 0x0158 and 0x0159. > > Realtek is working on a patch to properly support auto-delink for other > IDs. > > BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1838886 > Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng > --- > v3: > - Whitelisting instead of adding new module parameter. > v2: > - Use auto_delink_support instead of auto_delink_enable. > > drivers/usb/storage/realtek_cr.c | 13 ++++++++----- > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/storage/realtek_cr.c b/drivers/usb/storage/realtek_cr.c > index beaffac805af..1d9ce9cbc831 100644 > --- a/drivers/usb/storage/realtek_cr.c > +++ b/drivers/usb/storage/realtek_cr.c > @@ -996,12 +996,15 @@ static int init_realtek_cr(struct us_data *us) > goto INIT_FAIL; > } > > - if (CHECK_FW_VER(chip, 0x5888) || CHECK_FW_VER(chip, 0x5889) || > - CHECK_FW_VER(chip, 0x5901)) > - SET_AUTO_DELINK(chip); > - if (STATUS_LEN(chip) == 16) { > - if (SUPPORT_AUTO_DELINK(chip)) > + if (CHECK_PID(chip, 0x0138) || CHECK_PID(chip, 0x0158) || > + CHECK_PID(chip, 0x0159)) { > + if (CHECK_FW_VER(chip, 0x5888) || CHECK_FW_VER(chip, 0x5889) || > + CHECK_FW_VER(chip, 0x5901)) > SET_AUTO_DELINK(chip); > + if (STATUS_LEN(chip) == 16) { > + if (SUPPORT_AUTO_DELINK(chip)) > + SET_AUTO_DELINK(chip); > + } > } > #ifdef CONFIG_REALTEK_AUTOPM > if (ss_en) For both patches in this series: Acked-by: Alan Stern Shouldn't this patch go into the -stable kernels as well? Alan Stern