Received: by 2002:a25:8b12:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i18csp68431ybl; Tue, 27 Aug 2019 16:00:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwd22hMls3EUuUISLP66flKNGbd4+GS8SAtY9fyZEBPAnoPIOiCBlKhKMAviA6d12cWLj2i X-Received: by 2002:a65:5889:: with SMTP id d9mr753823pgu.380.1566946821653; Tue, 27 Aug 2019 16:00:21 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1566946821; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=N2VCsnkql7OtpbBTk0GoNWQd0++WefbvqGJyP33lc0zGhv3q1NxDlASqIhgXwX5V3b f/CGakKt1Z8thizHsj4vC/005RZW5EZLptt2wTcmFHgRWZcHFc/ZzCS8S6VSA2iCBELo e0YYqUsmijsEWse9tV50cbAJ/XpvO4EjwdyYEcuc3F3iYfrVqMfNCKQAMDzP6Zpa7Vpb Xex9Be366mhk2IS+dBN07yfDjqrG1/WYNjDppUxZTWZw0SColPTTa3uf5FgsjRHR3E5p ZwXIHuyTXQKAfHlDJdeJIIc6qUOma4+qUiHNTsJx2kDxO+sGkKsFbmjtMJQLswvK8i45 JQJA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=6Gy9UYNPrjhVadbpdVUucwP9MSrjq3igxdB99wTnRUM=; b=egwVcak+/aCWx3eKAxxbcUzDFrDrViSQXEITM6rfN/LRR3/IeOO8caiL8ugKAV2Xpd lL8TMjh80NuEw92rg6/+HW8BKQijgI5s6wLvGN/k5/uisBFEZYj5/ict7Dt/U/FNcqar I7ad8OJ2mSUlGx330TOti++PBc4lQZykV6yAItWyLLhJr13fq9XvD+nOQqpxlOjZLODC X20Fm1yaQXP12ZDhaSg4cyiFTcytW/JdP1mO/qdrZ7DNPHPnelhijOhhpbHdFJF9JVMs vlUclk0ecw5tG5CVfiGSGSxz8E9KjgjJLjIsH0qgvQhJqf45gco7r4hR6D/M4XMPsLUj vfnA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 94si337702plc.407.2019.08.27.16.00.02; Tue, 27 Aug 2019 16:00:21 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726092AbfH0W7H (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 27 Aug 2019 18:59:07 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:50952 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725997AbfH0W7H (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Aug 2019 18:59:07 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93D233084244; Tue, 27 Aug 2019 22:59:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ming.t460p (ovpn-8-16.pek2.redhat.com [10.72.8.16]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C6825D6B0; Tue, 27 Aug 2019 22:58:53 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2019 06:58:30 +0800 From: Ming Lei To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Long Li , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Keith Busch , Jens Axboe , Christoph Hellwig , Sagi Grimberg , John Garry , Hannes Reinecke , linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] softirq: implement IRQ flood detection mechanism Message-ID: <20190827225827.GA5263@ming.t460p> References: <20190827085344.30799-1-ming.lei@redhat.com> <20190827085344.30799-2-ming.lei@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.3 (2019-02-01) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.15 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.40]); Tue, 27 Aug 2019 22:59:07 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 04:42:02PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Tue, 27 Aug 2019, Ming Lei wrote: > > +/* > > + * Update average irq interval with the Exponential Weighted Moving > > + * Average(EWMA) > > + */ > > +static void irq_update_interval(void) > > +{ > > +#define IRQ_INTERVAL_EWMA_WEIGHT 128 > > +#define IRQ_INTERVAL_EWMA_PREV_FACTOR 127 > > +#define IRQ_INTERVAL_EWMA_CURR_FACTOR (IRQ_INTERVAL_EWMA_WEIGHT - \ > > + IRQ_INTERVAL_EWMA_PREV_FACTOR) > > Please do not stick defines into a function body. That's horrible. OK. > > > + > > + int cpu = raw_smp_processor_id(); > > + struct irq_interval *inter = per_cpu_ptr(&avg_irq_interval, cpu); > > + u64 delta = sched_clock_cpu(cpu) - inter->last_irq_end; > > Why are you doing that raw_smp_processor_id() dance? The call site has > interrupts and preemption disabled. OK, will change to __smp_processor_id(). > > Also how is that supposed to work when sched_clock is jiffies based? Good catch, looks ktime_get_ns() is needed. > > > + inter->avg = (inter->avg * IRQ_INTERVAL_EWMA_PREV_FACTOR + > > + delta * IRQ_INTERVAL_EWMA_CURR_FACTOR) / > > + IRQ_INTERVAL_EWMA_WEIGHT; > > We definitely are not going to have a 64bit multiplication and division on > every interrupt. Asided of that this breaks 32bit builds all over the place. I will convert the above into add/subtract/shift only. thanks, Ming