Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964926AbVLSTy6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Dec 2005 14:54:58 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964925AbVLSTy6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Dec 2005 14:54:58 -0500 Received: from mail.gmx.de ([213.165.64.21]:60858 "HELO mail.gmx.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S964924AbVLSTy5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Dec 2005 14:54:57 -0500 X-Authenticated: #5082238 Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 20:54:58 +0100 From: Carsten Otto To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Intel e1000 fails after RAM upgrade Message-ID: <20051219195458.GA23650@carsten-otto.halifax.rwth-aachen.de> Reply-To: c-otto@gmx.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc" Content-Disposition: inline X-GnuGP-Key: http://c-otto.de/pubkey.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3149 Lines: 106 --C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi there! First the basic system specs: Athlon64 3500+ S939, Winchester Kernel 2.6.14.4, X86_64 4*1 GB RAM DDR 333, Dual Channel [before: 2*1 GB RAM DDR 400, Dual Channel] Intel Gigabit PCI (Intel Corporation 82540EM Gigabit Ethernet Controller (r= ev 02)) Abit AV8 After upgrading the memory to 4 GB I noticed my e1000 did not work. dmesg shows: e1000: eth0: e1000_watchdog_task: NIC Link is Up 1000 Mbps Full Duplex e1000: eth0: e1000_clean_tx_irq: Detected Tx Unit Hang TDH <2000> TDT <2000> next_to_use <6> next_to_clean <0> buffer_info[next_to_clean] dma <13024c002> time_stamp next_to_watch <0> jiffies next_to_watch.status <0> e1000: eth0: e1000_clean_tx_irq: Detected Tx Unit Hang TDH <2000> TDT <2000> next_to_use <6> next_to_clean <0> buffer_info[next_to_clean] dma <13024c002> time_stamp next_to_watch <0> jiffies next_to_watch.status <0> eth0: no IPv6 routers present e1000: eth0: e1000_clean_tx_irq: Detected Tx Unit Hang TDH <2000> TDT <2000> next_to_use <6> next_to_clean <0> buffer_info[next_to_clean] dma <13024c002> time_stamp next_to_watch <0> jiffies next_to_watch.status <0> e1000: eth0: e1000_clean_tx_irq: Detected Tx Unit Hang TDH <2000> TDT <2000> next_to_use <6> next_to_clean <0> buffer_info[next_to_clean] dma <13024c002> time_stamp next_to_watch <0> jiffies next_to_watch.status <0> ethtool -t eth0 offline: The test result is FAIL The test extra info: Register test (offline) 40 Eeprom test (offline) 0 Interrupt test (offline) 4 Loopback test (offline) 13 Link test (on/offline) 1 I have two of these cards. Both run fine in my (old, 32bit) server. I tested with both cards with both systems. Only in my 64bit machine this error occurs - with both cards. Please tell me what to do. I have to live with the VIA onboard in the meantime and that is not the best network card... Thanks a lot, --=20 Carsten Otto c-otto@gmx.de www.c-otto.de --C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDpxASjUF4jpCSQBQRAkDDAJ9wHj+k0ij4rI6HSYHUariwQa9IkwCghKLr xRzqguC24TxOMV1vs4JBkv0= =l6+W -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc-- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/