Received: by 2002:a25:8b12:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i18csp643903ybl; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 03:15:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwd7UBL0sbN+9Uh8/66SP6+EHp3xxeu/wxZVUdL4PLP6hi4CUmUGWuSa/NdRibIjyJEAHYv X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:2841:: with SMTP id p1mr3478037pjf.101.1566987328783; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 03:15:28 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1566987328; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=I64tCKOGo6p9/BqLYsCjs7LbfmC/ZOJhh0YHW7y8hPaPNmjQuZ6/MaG5SVysDBKcGQ Lc9bHjtW/wEnMOgfVDGZd7CT3oMkMmCk4riNWOneDLqPuDFYyK/q3TnJkLs9vPDh5TOO HmQsBa/SsttIxvZ4ty3ofH7VUtlkfyF06Cw3JBZCoiyOcXGl7tt++4rwX+4jhGKN8qll 3JiOfyTcaSKyLo04Rv7E98PeFeK71MZ6bNeAo45T23s36XAKqkoy1QT10FJrYGh1Om+m lvKDXwYZhUswv7WjC3pKSmDmOcF6BFSNoApfA5DuVz5ZYhXM6vpDUY28yOm4++IA5CUJ 5GVw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject; bh=xhTfsjW6prQrVCg6aAtQB3zMUOv3hrbuUQ0MuctYESc=; b=pfbxW6w44k+GzVXu0/Z5TFlDuSrfwnYIHD/K9QI1w+/17bVpXbVXF1xZQI5LAq1DHh Wab2rFP7E8R2fE6LvFdQLfH/bhDKUY4v0wWq/iHU4kJUXHjospQMoGi62IiobdZzS0M+ rTKU9NPvA3qj3UjGMbTDJ1R6K/156ceVVQyw8+fAGPgJt7rvx7hZrnVKkuG+ASdhTKx9 oSZKSQWUzm4tdkHytpfEwnhZDXbwh4BXDDCXYUhs3A+xRVDcBOgQxXVzxYIZz7GfeK/n oq9yeci7haxRKeegJhNAXucbxjNsvFmrnpiaQ7kdL0lecfWJOTFw+mko3beN8kvfINUs YGDQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f17si1762656pgh.552.2019.08.28.03.15.12; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 03:15:28 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726328AbfH1KMy (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 28 Aug 2019 06:12:54 -0400 Received: from www262.sakura.ne.jp ([202.181.97.72]:51235 "EHLO www262.sakura.ne.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726246AbfH1KMx (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Aug 2019 06:12:53 -0400 Received: from fsav403.sakura.ne.jp (fsav403.sakura.ne.jp [133.242.250.102]) by www262.sakura.ne.jp (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x7SACp1l077983; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 19:12:51 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp) Received: from www262.sakura.ne.jp (202.181.97.72) by fsav403.sakura.ne.jp (F-Secure/fsigk_smtp/530/fsav403.sakura.ne.jp); Wed, 28 Aug 2019 19:12:51 +0900 (JST) X-Virus-Status: clean(F-Secure/fsigk_smtp/530/fsav403.sakura.ne.jp) Received: from [192.168.1.8] (softbank126227201116.bbtec.net [126.227.201.116]) (authenticated bits=0) by www262.sakura.ne.jp (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x7SACigC077678 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 28 Aug 2019 19:12:51 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp) Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] OOM Debug print selection and additional information To: Michal Hocko , Edward Chron Cc: Qian Cai , Andrew Morton , Roman Gushchin , Johannes Weiner , David Rientjes , Shakeel Butt , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ivan Delalande References: <20190826193638.6638-1-echron@arista.com> <1566909632.5576.14.camel@lca.pw> <79FC3DA1-47F0-4FFC-A92B-9A7EBCE3F15F@lca.pw> <2A1D8FFC-9E9E-4D86-9A0E-28F8263CC508@lca.pw> <20190828070845.GC7386@dhcp22.suse.cz> From: Tetsuo Handa Message-ID: <2e816b05-7b5b-4bc0-8d38-8415daea920d@i-love.sakura.ne.jp> Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2019 19:12:41 +0900 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190828070845.GC7386@dhcp22.suse.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2019/08/28 16:08, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Tue 27-08-19 19:47:22, Edward Chron wrote: >> For production systems installing and updating EBPF scripts may someday >> be very common, but I wonder how data center managers feel about it now? >> Developers are very excited about it and it is a very powerful tool but can I >> get permission to add or replace an existing EBPF on production systems? > > I am not sure I understand. There must be somebody trusted to take care > of systems, right? > Speak of my cases, those who take care of their systems are not developers. And they afraid changing code that runs in kernel mode. They unlikely give permission to install SystemTap/eBPF scripts. As a result, in many cases, the root cause cannot be identified. Moreover, we are talking about OOM situations, where we can't expect userspace processes to work properly. We need to dump information we want, without counting on userspace processes, before sending SIGKILL.