Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Wed, 28 Aug 2019 21:02:46 +0900
From:   Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>
To:     Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Cc:     Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
        Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= <uwe@kleine-koenig.org>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>, Enrico@kleine-koenig.org,
        Weigelt@kleine-koenig.org,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        metux IT consult <lkml@metux.net>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] vsprintf: introduce %dE for error constants
Message-ID: <20190828120246.GA31416@jagdpanzerIV>
References: <20190827211244.7210-1-uwe@kleine-koenig.org>
 <20190828113216.p2yiha4xyupkbcbs@pathway.suse.cz>
 <87o9097bff.fsf@intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87o9097bff.fsf@intel.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On (08/28/19 14:54), Jani Nikula wrote:
[..]
> > I personally think that this feature is not worth the code, data,
> > and bikeshedding.
> 
> The obvious alternative, I think already mentioned, is to just add
> strerror() or similar as a function. I doubt there'd be much opposition
> to that. Folks could use %s and strerr(ret). And a follow-up could add
> the special format specifier if needed.

Yeah, I'd say that strerror() would be a better alternative
to vsprintf() specifier. (if we decide to add such functionality).

	-ss