Received: by 2002:a25:8b12:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i18csp831452ybl; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 06:05:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyijYQOHTwIy8aqd5IakexJroWPfya2TKyj/c8Pv1d5x/uQNMXix7Ofd5MjSWT2ooem8TIr X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:1105:: with SMTP id d5mr4302955pla.197.1566997503024; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 06:05:03 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1566997503; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=klZgI0wvOB1eiwD5dhEzwzjgHcT5llbsyUBGEE730SEfbVYnoHh2e8BDWjQD30kXwV DmkCjEI1gCpr2T4xeeAoRccP/pwlPYoAQ0WtpzX4FivmY0HsSWZDUPir9J3BzRUFyDRp AABnhR4l+4xZJ0yJiDgsfjSARVKnUv8t7hzKFcQc7JNi4eD8U6s85xlADJqfKnbdn0V8 bITdCiP13dj05pHYlp+m0nehSg6OHAI+tYPo401OFI/4VIlmaLqLOMCOWSxycZftq6P5 UtjKz+lARjdP8HVPBlFDj9YGkBXc+F53SlZxaPW3F8NJapl0SWk4b869FmpraekRUCat qUWw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from; bh=k9xbIEDjPht7WcrThXUJl2/u+o4NNuT5+lCD5o5tUOM=; b=TUXuLgQ8j0rAiHnZ1ZqA18vJ17MMShzLBi+Hzn4eTjx7mkCJHjnqV5dGVI2WaTDCHk iVTDSgUn0MZ8WEaKvnbsmmIhe6rHXJv2Xzxbz9kqP1Z19mpOIe2GT27+ILeEvcX3ox8N 0onHn9cAiIs76la/MwCzLRIAvke7dT++ej1KN4EdDdWc4fHttNHcttywu3GCal7Fz0SJ ldMs4UDcrROtk4CoRdY8WBPuCifVb5dK5OzBVeHS5Wj9vJYWIUbJlmELwLIauP5+6wSH xtKF1G4Zs6GJRyDiSlkVDf334TNiGqLoqRKewZiaBWZPPuUUShjEKMtAFX7h6xbMr2OW bInA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id o185si2509859pfb.206.2019.08.28.06.04.45; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 06:05:03 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726508AbfH1NBh (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 28 Aug 2019 09:01:37 -0400 Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.11.71.1]:53577 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726272AbfH1NBh (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Aug 2019 09:01:37 -0400 Received: from authenticated.ozlabs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 46JQqK61lWz9sBF; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 23:01:33 +1000 (AEST) From: Michael Ellerman To: Scott Wood Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com, yebin10@huawei.com, thunder.leizhen@huawei.com, jingxiangfeng@huawei.com, fanchengyang@huawei.com, zhaohongjiang@huawei.com, Jason Yan , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, diana.craciun@nxp.com, christophe.leroy@c-s.fr, benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org, npiggin@gmail.com, keescook@chromium.org, kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/12] implement KASLR for powerpc/fsl_booke/32 In-Reply-To: <827cc152757906a0ebc04bbe56cdf44683721eb4.camel@buserror.net> References: <20190809100800.5426-1-yanaijie@huawei.com> <529fd908-42d6-f96f-daa2-9010f3035879@huawei.com> <878srf4cjk.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> <827cc152757906a0ebc04bbe56cdf44683721eb4.camel@buserror.net> Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2019 23:01:28 +1000 Message-ID: <87h861v3yv.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Scott Wood writes: > On Tue, 2019-08-27 at 11:33 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote: >> Jason Yan writes: >> > A polite ping :) >> > >> > What else should I do now? >> >> That's a good question. >> >> Scott, are you still maintaining FSL bits, > > Sort of... now that it's become very low volume, it's easy to forget when > something does show up (or miss it if I'm not CCed). It'd probably help if I > were to just ack patches instead of thinking "I'll do a pull request for this > later" when it's just one or two patches per cycle. Yep, understand. Just sending acks is totally fine if you don't have enough for a pull request. cheers