Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750894AbVLTJh5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Dec 2005 04:37:57 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750896AbVLTJh5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Dec 2005 04:37:57 -0500 Received: from ookhoi.xs4all.nl ([213.84.114.66]:50055 "EHLO favonius.humilis.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750868AbVLTJh4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Dec 2005 04:37:56 -0500 Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 10:38:02 +0100 From: Sander To: Coywolf Qi Hunt Cc: sander@humilis.net, Willy Tarreau , john stultz , lkml , greg@kroah.com, axboe@suse.de, vandrove@vc.cvut.cz, aia21@cam.ac.uk, akpm@osdl.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Let non-root users eject their ipods? Message-ID: <20051220093802.GA15866@favonius> Reply-To: sander@humilis.net References: <1135047119.8407.24.camel@leatherman> <20051220051821.GM15993@alpha.home.local> <2cd57c900512192206g7292cb1m@mail.gmail.com> <20051220085653.GA3137@favonius> <2cd57c900512200131l4ff29837o@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2cd57c900512200131l4ff29837o@mail.gmail.com> X-Uptime: 10:33:31 up 32 days, 21:33, 26 users, load average: 2.06, 1.36, 1.38 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1927 Lines: 45 Coywolf Qi Hunt wrote (ao): > 2005/12/20, Sander : > > Coywolf Qi Hunt wrote (ao): > > > 2005/12/20, Willy Tarreau : > > > > On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 06:51:58PM -0800, john stultz wrote: > > > > > I'm getting a little tired of my roommates not knowing how to safely > > > > > eject their usb-flash disks from my system and I'd personally like it if > > > > > I could avoid bringing up a root shell to eject my ipod. Sure, one could > > > > > suid the eject command, but that seems just as bad as changing the > > > > > permissions in the kernel (eject wouldn't be able to check if the user > > > > > has read/write permissions on the device, allowing them to eject > > > > > anything). > > > > > > > > You may find my question stupid, but what is wrong with umount ? That's > > > > how I proceed with usb-flash and I've never sent any eject command to > > > > it (I even didn't know that the ioctl would be accepted by an sd device). > > > > > > IMHO, umount doesn't guarantee sync, isn't it? > > Actually I was think umount(2), since this is the kernel list, but off > topic here. > > > > > I'm pretty sure it does :-) > > That is because: usually your removable media is not the file system > root, hence umount(8) can return successfully only if no processes are > busy working on it. > > If you boot from or chroot/pivot into a removable media, and you > remount it ro, and unplug it, then you may lose data. eject wont help you here, right? And the OP was talking about usb-flash sticks his roommates use and his ipod. He doesn't need to eject those. umount will do. -- Humilis IT Services and Solutions http://www.humilis.net - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/