Received: by 2002:a25:8b12:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i18csp1554931ybl; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 17:03:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyo+cXqtTOL1A+WZ9IgLwDiDIIb+QwP4pp749RvvtuklPWZ4WxUWKT/6KGmL8FEQGPrkiIW X-Received: by 2002:a63:8ac4:: with SMTP id y187mr5872162pgd.412.1567036982479; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 17:03:02 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1567036982; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Aya93tqJ21nkNmX7bTYmdjsklu1Q9zpjBOOMcSP/5vWvr2aEAf/+1qdM8u/xRqMPEy TcLrIXWXwXPBXoLrYYQtL9J6gly34kBaIrEZIzGeJnii29Ca2WCiWYOU3kD2y5dnsM0G A7eopKl/TISSj+GTSvuFMScUKQs5tJPhmkDWNOyHsFx0kVfunN80PzJSFZ8hobhMRX2Z EWsD2jEgeRhT2Efe/bj95OX+eD0cLa9bog21Cpr69X2VMZ77Sw5W05AWJtUk1swWjOUp 9WwFUBb13KNNKb32GKIHBOgMilV5Sm6GKV03jTaAzTztcRY5YnQ1GkDQD4yE9gCpCzaS kFWg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version:references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject; bh=FXm8C70736n4/+bWaZf63M/3Joe7AJYdq83Z5RU+GCI=; b=V5RbdEDFIi+4zraM+F9ffWXfMNhILIu3EjkbOOr88Luo5dp+SgYYdPu2xRHW9GbQLO Fd4nDWOUNiP9ueC3KduRorjzAx/gnOpSUHETVTIKTC2RaAFxtN8d3Li9KK8UpIM9YjhT o8ZpmwedsnNOACJ/jW2g2t6HrBXauq/YYlrBJF/1NyUByCTrxmkSWKxvs1V3o75DgPP/ r6woqO9/oUMQq31lC6949+dVv/RypOmYmk6MdXQ3pSdT4Mc6pr2MGT/hBrBN8Uf5hmv3 kqMiVNr2QvgJZb1D0ZKvV++028JwxXUbkR7FqXr9OU0uuFacAFAm/wlz4WrD/usIpFLy cHCg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 3si364282plu.432.2019.08.28.17.02.41; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 17:03:02 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727072AbfH2ABr (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 28 Aug 2019 20:01:47 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:38498 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727002AbfH2ABr (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Aug 2019 20:01:47 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098394.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x7SNv3T0087175 for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 20:01:45 -0400 Received: from e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.100]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2up2mvhpw6-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 20:01:45 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Thu, 29 Aug 2019 01:01:43 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.196) by e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.134) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Thu, 29 Aug 2019 01:01:40 +0100 Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (mk.ibm.com [9.149.105.60]) by b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x7T01dRp21168142 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 29 Aug 2019 00:01:39 GMT Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D3F342042; Thu, 29 Aug 2019 00:01:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id B61F34207D; Thu, 29 Aug 2019 00:01:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [9.85.129.156]) by d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Aug 2019 00:01:37 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] sefltest/ima: support appended signatures (modsig) From: Mimi Zohar To: Thiago Jung Bauermann Cc: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, Petr Vorel , Jessica Yu , Dave Young , shuah , linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2019 20:01:37 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87o908eu7l.fsf@morokweng.localdomain> References: <1567005240-12912-1-git-send-email-zohar@linux.ibm.com> <87o908eu7l.fsf@morokweng.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.20.5 (3.20.5-1.fc24) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19082900-0016-0000-0000-000002A41152 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19082900-0017-0000-0000-0000330463C3 Message-Id: <1567036897.6115.94.camel@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-08-28_13:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=797 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1906280000 definitions=main-1908280221 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2019-08-28 at 20:38 -0300, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote: > Hello Mimi, > > Mimi Zohar writes: > > > In addition to the PE/COFF and IMA xattr signatures, the kexec kernel > > image can be signed with an appended signature, using the same > > scripts/sign-file tool that is used to sign kernel modules. > > > > This patch adds support for detecting a kernel image signed with an > > appended signature and updates the existing test messages > > appropriately. > > > > Reviewed-by: Petr Vorel > > Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar > > Thanks for doing this! You're welcome.  This isn't in lieu of a proper regression test that verifies the IMA measurement list template modsig and d-modsig data fields.  That still needs to be written. thanks, Mimi