Received: by 2002:a25:8b12:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i18csp1976643ybl; Thu, 29 Aug 2019 01:35:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzQLZaHFC6NZtd/ImB5M+P8bvnLlL+Wpxyb+tbVlL44qApg8vFoBPtYa4P6RGkeIh9UPeCX X-Received: by 2002:a63:3203:: with SMTP id y3mr7301038pgy.191.1567067748884; Thu, 29 Aug 2019 01:35:48 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1567067748; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=KzSVVesyLbbR9KzjWKNlAZH5JhBEAKZBYkjP8go3eZr4ULoKcdVpLfIGOMsW2RTMKV GvXFiZoTcHMbAKcVpOe8M2FShOH4YDNeuEleeH3cFdRsrpzj7U3aze7OVh5LnXIgfok9 qEpRRnFfb0s/vdWhXpmqaXspr8Z0wuGKxWiksEdQY047zEtrLRE+GFtVNxMPoGFfyyqU NTBI5sdyhsT7frjgl9+2rj4O2QFiv/8gE4wVngsXALvzgQjhgt6mKlnp/zHmxLUCSF6j PalIqieotlsbcQMdVFcmWnjj/LD9kimcC2SNjKek764zIAqdctYb5SQK/DOnr2a8VtcV nZbA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=t1q/+g6t8kZKE70fI5drSzgQM+gtTD2GYlLYSio+Xzc=; b=Sa++4jbggQuYYm60KDKnTxwzaKtYlQ4e6TpTpWoDHdoVR/l0039F3owDql2wgqAUO9 3ChLVG7xbkdDfPFwAMNBXQ2escN6Bqij2Peb9IEzFRn34w9DudlqlBjVNNus/C2q3t3N mtjJYHbdmWHOhxqeoAKPpz8QuYQV2f7NBpJqIeG3lcHCx2no7YscfnKXGBTDEpEiiNlD WLoRqwraJ6JG/Zhq/Of9UxNkEd7Xx/U3Q7TJiHledUB5GoUuoE5kP/ZsgjvSQPr9JG2e a10GDTvGytlh2y987YATZ7iJh+l2hcDQkfXOYYuZwImiC84mhxmqOE7kIUYn6UE3r6/+ PD7A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 31si1271479pld.65.2019.08.29.01.35.33; Thu, 29 Aug 2019 01:35:48 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727207AbfH2Idy (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 29 Aug 2019 04:33:54 -0400 Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:37820 "EHLO gate.crashing.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727994AbfH2IdT (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Aug 2019 04:33:19 -0400 Received: from gate.crashing.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id x7T8X083006230; Thu, 29 Aug 2019 03:33:00 -0500 Received: (from segher@localhost) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id x7T8WxRj006229; Thu, 29 Aug 2019 03:32:59 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: gate.crashing.org: segher set sender to segher@kernel.crashing.org using -f Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2019 03:32:59 -0500 From: Segher Boessenkool To: Nick Desaulniers Cc: Nathan Chancellor , LKML , "# 3.4.x" , clang-built-linux , Paul Mackerras , linuxppc-dev Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Avoid clang warnings around setjmp and longjmp Message-ID: <20190829083259.GI31406@gate.crashing.org> References: <20190812023214.107817-1-natechancellor@gmail.com> <878srdv206.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> <20190828175322.GA121833@archlinux-threadripper> <20190828184529.GC127646@archlinux-threadripper> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 03:16:19PM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote: > That's a good reason IMO. IIRC, the -fno-builtin-* flags don't warn > if * is some unrecognized value, so -fno-builtin-setjmp may not > actually do anything, and you may need to scan the source (of clang or > llvm). -fno-builtin-foo makes the compiler not handle "foo" the same as it handles "__builtin_foo". If the compiler has no idea about "foo", well, that is exactly what it does then anyhow, so why would it warn :-) Segher