Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 10 Nov 2000 16:25:06 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 10 Nov 2000 16:24:56 -0500 Received: from [194.213.32.137] ([194.213.32.137]:5124 "EHLO bug.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 10 Nov 2000 16:24:40 -0500 Message-ID: <20001110154254.A33@bug.ucw.cz> Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2000 15:42:54 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: Alan Cox , Antony Suter Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: rdtsc to mili secs? In-Reply-To: <3A078C65.B3C146EC@mira.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93i In-Reply-To: ; from Alan Cox on Tue, Nov 07, 2000 at 12:18:28PM +0000 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! > > This issue, and all related issues, need to be taken care of for all > > speed > > changing CPUs from Intel, AMD and Transmeta. Is the answer of "howto > > Sensibly configured power saving/speed throttle systems do not change the > frequency at all. The duty cycle is changed and this controls the cpu > performance but the tsc is constant Do you have an example of notebook that does powersaving like that? I have 2 examples of notebooks with changing TSC speed... -- I'm pavel@ucw.cz. "In my country we have almost anarchy and I don't care." Panos Katsaloulis describing me w.r.t. patents at discuss@linmodems.org - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/