Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Thu, 29 Aug 2019 03:56:15 -0700
From:   "hch@infradead.org" <hch@infradead.org>
To:     Atish Patra <Atish.Patra@wdc.com>
Cc:     "hch@infradead.org" <hch@infradead.org>,
        "aou@eecs.berkeley.edu" <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
        "alankao@andestech.com" <alankao@andestech.com>,
        "gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        "anup@brainfault.org" <anup@brainfault.org>,
        "palmer@sifive.com" <palmer@sifive.com>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "rppt@linux.ibm.com" <rppt@linux.ibm.com>,
        "alexios.zavras@intel.com" <alexios.zavras@intel.com>,
        "gary@garyguo.net" <gary@garyguo.net>,
        "paul.walmsley@sifive.com" <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
        "linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org" <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
        "tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] RISC-V: Mark existing SBI as legacy SBI.
Message-ID: <20190829105615.GA8968@infradead.org>
References: <20190826233256.32383-1-atish.patra@wdc.com>
 <20190826233256.32383-2-atish.patra@wdc.com>
 <20190827140304.GA21855@infradead.org>
 <ac3cfe4502090354a7c49fae277adb757ad900d5.camel@wdc.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <ac3cfe4502090354a7c49fae277adb757ad900d5.camel@wdc.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.4 (2019-03-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 08:37:27PM +0000, Atish Patra wrote:
> That would split the implementation between C file & assembly file for
> no good reason.
> 
> How about moving everything in sbi.c and just write everything inline
> assembly there.

Well, if we implement it in pure assembly that would be the entire
implementation, wouldn't it?