Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Thu, 29 Aug 2019 13:49:47 +0200
From:   Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To:     Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Cc:     Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
        Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
        David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
        Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
        Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: s390: Test for bad access register at the start of
 S390_MEM_OP
Message-ID: <20190829134947.167bae1d.cohuck@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <d2a3c09c-bb99-e065-22f3-6eda3e9a2581@redhat.com>
References: <20190829105356.27805-1-thuth@redhat.com>
        <20190829131845.5a72231a.cohuck@redhat.com>
        <d2a3c09c-bb99-e065-22f3-6eda3e9a2581@redhat.com>
Organization: Red Hat GmbH
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, 29 Aug 2019 13:47:59 +0200
Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> wrote:

> On 29/08/2019 13.18, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> [...]
> > 
> > Btw: should Documentation/virt/kvm/api.txt spell out the valid range
> > for ar explicitly?
> >   
> 
> That certainly would not hurt. Care to send a patch, or shall I assemble
> one?
> 
>  Thomas

Will do.