Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Thu, 29 Aug 2019 16:21:57 +0300
From:   Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
To:     Peter Jones <pjones@redhat.com>
Cc:     Matthew Garrett <mjg59@google.com>, ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org,
        Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>,
        Bartosz Szczepanek <bsz@semihalf.com>,
        Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>,
        linux-efi <linux-efi@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] efi+tpm: Don't access event->count when it isn't
 mapped.
Message-ID: <20190829132136.cipjjqcxmrqs2sp7@linux.intel.com>
References: <20190826153028.32639-1-pjones@redhat.com>
 <20190826162823.4mxkwhd7mbtro3zy@linux.intel.com>
 <CACdnJuuB_ExhOOtA8Uh7WO42TSNfRHuGaK4Xo=5SbdfWDKr7wA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20190827110344.4uvjppmkkaeex3mk@linux.intel.com>
 <20190827134155.otm6ekeb53siy6lb@linux.intel.com>
 <20190827221157.mngkglcgj4azux7b@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190827221157.mngkglcgj4azux7b@redhat.com>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 06:11:58PM -0400, Peter Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 04:41:55PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 02:03:44PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > > Jarkko, these two should probably go to 5.3 if possible - I
> > > > independently had a report of a system hitting this issue last week
> > > > (Intel apparently put a surprising amount of data in the event logs on
> > > > the NUCs).
> > > 
> > > OK, I can try to push them. I'll do PR today.
> > 
> > Ard, how do you wish these to be managed?
> > 
> > I'm asking this because:
> > 
> > 1. Neither patch was CC'd to linux-integrity.
> > 2. Neither patch has your tags ATM.
> 
> I think Ard's not back until September.  I can just to re-send them with
> the accumulated tags and Cc linux-integrity, if you think that would
> help?

I take the risk. If possible, add all the cumulated tags to those
patches...

/Jarkko