Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Fri, 30 Aug 2019 01:26:02 +0800
From:   Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@huawei.com>
To:     Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
CC:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
        Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
        Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>, Pavel Machek <pavel@denx.de>,
        David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>,
        Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>,
        "Darrick J . Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>,
        "Dave Chinner" <david@fromorbit.com>,
        Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>, <devel@driverdev.osuosl.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        <linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org>, Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>,
        Miao Xie <miaoxie@huawei.com>,
        Li Guifu <bluce.liguifu@huawei.com>,
        Fang Wei <fangwei1@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 01/24] erofs: add on-disk layout
Message-ID: <20190829172602.GA228414@architecture4>
References: <20190802125347.166018-1-gaoxiang25@huawei.com>
 <20190802125347.166018-2-gaoxiang25@huawei.com>
 <20190829095954.GB20598@infradead.org>
 <20190829103252.GA64893@architecture4>
 <67d6efbbc9ac6db23215660cb970b7ef29dc0c1d.camel@perches.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <67d6efbbc9ac6db23215660cb970b7ef29dc0c1d.camel@perches.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi Joe,

On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 08:58:17AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-08-29 at 18:32 +0800, Gao Xiang wrote:
> > Hi Christoph,
> > 
> > On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 02:59:54AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > +++ b/fs/erofs/erofs_fs.h
> > > > @@ -0,0 +1,316 @@
> > > > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only OR Apache-2.0 */
> > > > +/*
> > > > + * linux/fs/erofs/erofs_fs.h
> > > 
> > > Please remove the pointless file names in the comment headers.
> > 
> > Already removed in the latest version.
> > 
> > > > +struct erofs_super_block {
> > > > +/*  0 */__le32 magic;           /* in the little endian */
> > > > +/*  4 */__le32 checksum;        /* crc32c(super_block) */
> > > > +/*  8 */__le32 features;        /* (aka. feature_compat) */
> > > > +/* 12 */__u8 blkszbits;         /* support block_size == PAGE_SIZE only */
> > > 
> > > Please remove all the byte offset comments.  That is something that can
> > > easily be checked with gdb or pahole.
> > 
> > I have no idea the actual issue here.
> > It will help all developpers better add fields or calculate
> > these offsets in their mind, and with care.
> > 
> > Rather than they didn't run "gdb" or "pahole" and change it by mistake.
> 
> I think Christoph is not right here.
> 
> Using external tools for validation is extra work
> when necessary for understanding the code.
> 
> The expected offset is somewhat valuable, but
> perhaps the form is a bit off given the visual
> run-in to the field types.
> 
> The extra work with this form is manipulating all
> the offsets whenever a structure change occurs.
> 
> The comments might be better with a form more like:

Thanks for your comment.
I will change those places as you suggested, that is fine.

Thanks,
Gao Xiang

> 
> struct erofs_super_block {	/* offset description */
> 	__le32 magic;		/*   0  */
> 	__le32 checksum;	/*   4  crc32c(super_block) */
> 	__le32 features;	/*   8  (aka. feature_compat) */
> 	__u8 blkszbits;		/*  12  support block_size == PAGE_SIZE only */
> 
>