Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Thu, 29 Aug 2019 14:16:31 -0500
From:   Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To:     Henry Chen <henryc.chen@mediatek.com>
Cc:     Georgi Djakov <georgi.djakov@linaro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
        Viresh Kumar <vireshk@kernel.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>,
        Ryan Case <ryandcase@chromium.org>,
        Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@google.com>,
        Fan Chen <fan.chen@mediatek.com>,
        James Liao <jamesjj.liao@mediatek.com>,
        Weiyi Lu <weiyi.lu@mediatek.com>, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Henry Chen <henryc.chen@mediatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 01/10] dt-bindings: soc: Add dvfsrc driver bindings
Message-ID: <20190829191631.GA15714@bogus>
References: <1566995328-15158-1-git-send-email-henryc.chen@mediatek.com>
 <1566995328-15158-2-git-send-email-henryc.chen@mediatek.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1566995328-15158-2-git-send-email-henryc.chen@mediatek.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 28 Aug 2019 20:28:39 +0800, Henry Chen wrote:
> Document the binding for enabling dvfsrc on MediaTek SoC.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Henry Chen <henryc.chen@mediatek.com>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/soc/mediatek/dvfsrc.txt    | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/dt-bindings/soc/mtk,dvfsrc.h               | 14 +++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 37 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/mediatek/dvfsrc.txt
>  create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/soc/mtk,dvfsrc.h
> 

Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However,
there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream
maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply.

If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.