Received: by 2002:a25:8b12:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i18csp594479ybl; Fri, 30 Aug 2019 04:28:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyxgv4tZP/JBUUgGwJmCBZ1JR1b1MfYpcYgffchb9nrre58Bvkcfb7PeYMRtjqkAphiv01B X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:b288:: with SMTP id c8mr15107969pjr.135.1567164495764; Fri, 30 Aug 2019 04:28:15 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1567164495; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=RTwGeMXjLtGQCcgnPSad9iHUPOLOCUY/4F+RiyBT4zuSasiMm+XDGgo1NJrtn1baVx 0kVuTfEXU6D4h2xIeXWFpEgEMvrzLRVOe091I9BclIPw+3QVHCHB+/Qp1bkxrL9RVjJo Iz7r/u/hcNO06JQwqmVRtMWhc0Sx9dbQhJ1MjmlG5flpFZ+6nUcBgcU9tbe/SnEvH7rv a+mRzlx5HqkExU/2Y9MI3uwqiK19ostqEuhn7jtW71r3xWPCsHjAe1daOL7ceatUXFHY DimzkzPwHlYvhmWJEAjqS9LQWamjMzAJY6jrJiuc7Cej1kRfBb03iUVzBuTJg9+7sRGK 9w3g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=msziLnocdvHcufQhecf1ndPoXYQpydYItB5DtxtqBys=; b=B2xFn+8mDWsYTEORSd9y+hYN3Gdk5D7A/2+wEUcc5GpIIItWDOQSipLaHiudBBR6Ya ZmDvPBMgUngTsop3hl7Y4e8cHblGfmXEXl8d9QRfT+bSOuirR4q1ZTYIUXfL09rcqM8q Q0mufGvzkRgVW8ZWSgsI/35VF9kbbz6/itElvCr/5yn611mFd+JcDcmnnVQ7g6xhdM23 H4OCNKSqZFTrz7MdhueKK2sYaExOnWytoRS1q3VeHGov0Erx/EkQGvb6xZPnCybqMlts AkyZ5hA9KXntRrSPcoF9/pthvwXS7Pf8+Dp1caoushy+NDVUAGdCqjD7PxwuCL4XpfLn AbFw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@oracle.com header.s=corp-2019-08-05 header.b=jpaA2SoC; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=oracle.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 65si5785575pff.220.2019.08.30.04.27.58; Fri, 30 Aug 2019 04:28:15 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@oracle.com header.s=corp-2019-08-05 header.b=jpaA2SoC; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=oracle.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727857AbfH3L1G (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 30 Aug 2019 07:27:06 -0400 Received: from userp2120.oracle.com ([156.151.31.85]:34428 "EHLO userp2120.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726969AbfH3L1G (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Aug 2019 07:27:06 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (userp2120.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp2120.oracle.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x7UBOcKr117889; Fri, 30 Aug 2019 11:26:47 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=date : from : to : cc : subject : message-id : references : mime-version : content-type : in-reply-to; s=corp-2019-08-05; bh=msziLnocdvHcufQhecf1ndPoXYQpydYItB5DtxtqBys=; b=jpaA2SoCphPWyU2CtodN9hN9WGduAr03wluKxWZAhPa/t+mEzgqMOyQbmOzz+80mxBJW y+IbGti9rwDwrEpfNkjGQJnWMc96d5xzm/2WKKel5+PotG0xXF3Cn7OdY6dyHZYlKx75 ZMyUFrRiOx/IexSmRGFi9fkx+X76nkpfVPUWZVTKFiOoLk+iMaW08PtN0i7wCpKe9qKb sn365sGpV9w0E39NUx1bI5rdyYmBY+Th/M9GpcTk6K8CJY/p7gHjCjXVbCsc+pQDp9sJ lp3++0CzVnYqUFIyWaqAwBY79e0VE2cEV0H1UTcfIDxp4C1z+DrA167sr6ochQ71PrXu /A== Received: from aserp3020.oracle.com (aserp3020.oracle.com [141.146.126.70]) by userp2120.oracle.com with ESMTP id 2uq2w580df-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 30 Aug 2019 11:26:47 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (aserp3020.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by aserp3020.oracle.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x7UBNZ7j091929; Fri, 30 Aug 2019 11:26:46 GMT Received: from aserv0122.oracle.com (aserv0122.oracle.com [141.146.126.236]) by aserp3020.oracle.com with ESMTP id 2upc8xbmce-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 30 Aug 2019 11:26:46 +0000 Received: from abhmp0004.oracle.com (abhmp0004.oracle.com [141.146.116.10]) by aserv0122.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x7UBQhS3007665; Fri, 30 Aug 2019 11:26:43 GMT Received: from kadam (/41.57.98.10) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Fri, 30 Aug 2019 04:26:43 -0700 Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2019 14:26:12 +0300 From: Dan Carpenter To: Gao Xiang Cc: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, Sasha Levin , Valdis =?utf-8?Q?Kl=C4=93tnieks?= , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, OGAWA Hirofumi Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: exfat: add exfat filesystem code to staging Message-ID: <20190830112612.GF8372@kadam> References: <20190829095019.GA13557@kroah.com> <20190829103749.GA13661@infradead.org> <20190829111810.GA23393@kroah.com> <20190829151144.GJ23584@kadam> <20190829152757.GA125003@architecture4> <20190829154346.GK23584@kadam> <20190829155127.GA136563@architecture4> <20190829160441.GA141079@architecture4> <20190830083445.GL23584@kadam> <20190830084333.GA193084@architecture4> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190830084333.GA193084@architecture4> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9364 signatures=668685 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=2 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1906280000 definitions=main-1908300124 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9364 signatures=668685 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=2 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1906280000 definitions=main-1908300124 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 04:43:33PM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote: > Hi Dan, > > On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 11:34:45AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 12:04:41AM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote: > > > Anyway, I'm fine to delete them all if you like, but I think majority of these > > > are meaningful. > > > > > > data.c- /* page is already locked */ > > > data.c- DBG_BUGON(PageUptodate(page)); > > > data.c- > > > data.c: if (unlikely(err)) > > > data.c- SetPageError(page); > > > data.c- else > > > data.c- SetPageUptodate(page); > > > > If we cared about speed here then we would delete the DBG_BUGON() check > > because that's going to be expensive. The likely/unlikely annotations > > should be used in places a reasonable person thinks it will make a > > difference to benchmarks. > > DBG_BUGON will be a no-op ((void)x) in non-debugging mode, It expands to: ((void)PageUptodate(page)); Calling PageUptodate() doesn't do anything, but it isn't free. The time it takes to do that function call completely negates any speed up from using likely/unlikely. I'm really not trying to be a jerk... regards, dan carpenter