Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932186AbVLUAra (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Dec 2005 19:47:30 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932224AbVLUAra (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Dec 2005 19:47:30 -0500 Received: from ns.dynamicweb.hu ([195.228.155.139]:49591 "EHLO dynamicweb.hu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932186AbVLUAr3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Dec 2005 19:47:29 -0500 Message-ID: <00ad01c5eefd$7990b370$a700a8c0@dcccs> From: "JaniD++" To: "Roger Heflin" Cc: References: Subject: Re: buffer cache question Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 01:41:22 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 4073 Lines: 129 Hi, I have read back in the kernel-archives, and found this messages, about the same theme, but there is one difference! On the old messages: >Nate Diller wrote: > just found the culprit. guess i should have read the code the first > time. get_dirty_limits() in drivers/block/page_writeback.c has a > hard-coded upper limit to dirty_ratio. it's capped to half of the > unmapped pages, so maybe 30-40% of your system's memory. so if you are > brave, just remove the "/ 2" parts from the 'if (dirty_ratio > > unmapped_ratio / 2) dirty_ratio = unmapped_ratio / 2;' check, and you > can have all the OOM goodness you want. ... >I changed that bit of code to: > > if (dirty_ratio > unmapped_ratio - 10) > dirty_ratio = unmapped_ratio - 10; > >and added a couple of sanity checks so that it couldn't get below 5 or above 95. > >Then set /proc/sys/vm/dirty_ratio to 95 and dirty_background_ratio to 1. In this case, this modification is only for the *dirty* memory buffer. I want to use more buffer *cache*! :-) The unwritten dirty memory ratio is good enough for me. Anybody has an idea? Cheers, Janos ----- Original Message ----- From: "Roger Heflin" To: "'JaniD++'" ; Sent: Monday, December 19, 2005 7:15 PM Subject: RE: buffer cache question > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org > > [mailto:linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of JaniD++ > > Sent: Sunday, December 18, 2005 3:09 PM > > To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > Subject: buffer cache question > > > > Hello, list, > > > > I use 4 disk nodes with NBD. > > All of my nodes have 2GB ram. > > > > But the buffer cache newer rise over 830MB. > > > > Is there some limit? > > For writes only 40% of the ram can be "dirty". > > > Where can i change this limit? (if it is) > > I believe there is a way to change it, I am pretty sure that it has > been discussed on the kernel list a couple of months ago, I > don't remember exactly what the change is, and I think the change > was more complicated that was obvious. > > The previous subject on a similar thing was: > "kernel 2.6.13 buffer strangeness" > > Roger > > > > > Thanks, > > Janos > > > > [root@st-0001 root]# free > > total used free shared > > buffers cached > > Mem: 2073152 933188 1139964 0 > > 836776 43416 > > -/+ buffers/cache: 52996 2020156 > > Swap: 0 0 0 > > [root@st-0001 root]# cat /proc/meminfo > > MemTotal: 2073152 kB > > MemFree: 1139012 kB > > Buffers: 835928 kB > > Cached: 43448 kB > > SwapCached: 0 kB > > Active: 12872 kB > > Inactive: 871424 kB > > HighTotal: 1179584 kB > > HighFree: 1129764 kB > > LowTotal: 893568 kB > > LowFree: 9248 kB > > SwapTotal: 0 kB > > SwapFree: 0 kB > > Dirty: 0 kB > > Writeback: 0 kB > > Mapped: 9104 kB > > Slab: 30248 kB > > CommitLimit: 1036576 kB > > Committed_AS: 15428 kB > > PageTables: 408 kB > > VmallocTotal: 114680 kB > > VmallocUsed: 196 kB > > VmallocChunk: 114476 kB > > [root@st-0001 root]# > > > > - > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe > > linux-kernel" in the body of a message to > > majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at > > http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > > > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/