Received: by 2002:a25:8b12:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i18csp852847ybl; Fri, 30 Aug 2019 08:06:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzclqK6hs8+ohvbKST+m6JY7c89BZT94PHNlJ1wxD+tf930rBwgFl0JFP2YoCmuBe3bTcMi X-Received: by 2002:a62:5184:: with SMTP id f126mr18743272pfb.19.1567177588123; Fri, 30 Aug 2019 08:06:28 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1567177588; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=oZO5qPmxxsPLhyjaOIizL1uOWMJNRUeC0E/MYuT8+c4QR82g9P3K259ciPX0ONn5mK 2ZOnj+oAQAntYm3tRaNZ4GPLwdqQd8YwOKATaS7uE/74q1s0e8L9eZTA1hLF0uQcg0dC XoPi4xvYiyzKqSj5YFRVY8jZQt7ojTIyhdJArSC8WCh72OHhTDQdbeUzm57blacg1mBt JXi4eLMenF4zqVoMPmAMWZqwisWwDg9CQiqVckwbqWand7y9uuLli6Sq6fIov8fR+sT5 ojk+3TZgSXSXYYIQwEsVCpQ5178KspOUCTWMaIFghR0zRhyI9M7cgT9p1VPt9RI1N7Mq CJXQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date :subject:cc:to:from; bh=QRtHk2h0zN2aPVHYA/tnmeDKb1VTosCYHDG0FZndgBk=; b=KNnTqbpscd2Qf2sLFCgFw9qNJnoNRoTmaN6VR78sAN48Bqdwmmq7f7dedFc3rupduq 2uRXImMRP8hJ83COVEQxXAfSdDJmqNdnIOcWLznKIhhWOV/zE9ZbF/ikO5nUl6mwgpF4 b3GxoZzEOUeybDA5jyTDvUH70shVfRKFHaWZ9PGo3vXcFDARWxqvR7SCQpFskubJtcvu 4je+/J91fJLnWNZRNDG0XJ4GibtZWN2HhjlXHjE9POS9N7VslPX/47CCqJwMNl7YKKq1 UcNDvQiGkq6Mmojb0HEJAiILvy9Q/OpY6X/8Cxhc4cddJk5Ju5AFTHRHzHoYbXS4XnVk SU+Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id w1si1640237pgr.519.2019.08.30.08.06.11; Fri, 30 Aug 2019 08:06:28 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728331AbfH3PD3 (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 30 Aug 2019 11:03:29 -0400 Received: from andre.telenet-ops.be ([195.130.132.53]:54114 "EHLO andre.telenet-ops.be" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727938AbfH3PDK (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Aug 2019 11:03:10 -0400 Received: from ramsan ([84.194.98.4]) by andre.telenet-ops.be with bizsmtp id vT382000805gfCL01T38d5; Fri, 30 Aug 2019 17:03:09 +0200 Received: from rox.of.borg ([192.168.97.57]) by ramsan with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i3iQe-0003gl-6l; Fri, 30 Aug 2019 17:03:08 +0200 Received: from geert by rox.of.borg with local (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i3iQe-0005MP-5t; Fri, 30 Aug 2019 17:03:08 +0200 From: Geert Uytterhoeven To: Lorenzo Pieralisi , Catalin Marinas , Amit Kucheria , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland Cc: Daniel Lezcano , Nicolas Pitre , Sebastian Capella , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Geert Uytterhoeven Subject: [PATCH 3/5] dt-bindings: arm: idle-states: Correct "constraint guarantees" Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2019 17:03:00 +0200 Message-Id: <20190830150302.20551-4-geert+renesas@glider.be> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20190830150302.20551-1-geert+renesas@glider.be> References: <20190830150302.20551-1-geert+renesas@glider.be> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Correct "constraints guarantees" to "constraint guarantees". Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/idle-states.txt | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/idle-states.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/idle-states.txt index 6e651b7e62c328be..4ef0de5c0c7f5990 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/idle-states.txt +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/idle-states.txt @@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ the worst case since it depends on the CPU operating conditions, i.e. caches state). An OS has to reliably probe the wakeup-latency since some devices can enforce -latency constraints guarantees to work properly, so the OS has to detect the +latency constraint guarantees to work properly, so the OS has to detect the worst case wake-up latency it can incur if a CPU is allowed to enter an idle state, and possibly to prevent that to guarantee reliable device functioning. -- 2.17.1