Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Fri, 30 Aug 2019 21:06:45 +0200
From:   Michal =?UTF-8?B?U3VjaMOhbmVr?= <msuchanek@suse.de>
To:     linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc:     Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
        Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>,
        Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
        Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>,
        Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>,
        Andrew Donnellan <andrew.donnellan@au1.ibm.com>,
        Firoz Khan <firoz.khan@linaro.org>,
        Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>,
        Russell Currey <ruscur@russell.cc>,
        Nicolai Stange <nstange@suse.de>,
        Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>,
        "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
        Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
        Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>,
        David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Allison Randal <allison@lohutok.net>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 6/6] powerpc/perf: split callchain.c by bitness
Message-ID: <20190830210645.78931423@kitsune.suse.cz>
In-Reply-To: <567e7e876edf29ae528027d8574038fbc287f25a.1567188299.git.msuchanek@suse.de>
References: <cover.1567188299.git.msuchanek@suse.de>
        <567e7e876edf29ae528027d8574038fbc287f25a.1567188299.git.msuchanek@suse.de>
Organization: SUSE Linux
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, 30 Aug 2019 20:57:57 +0200
Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@suse.de> wrote:

> Building callchain.c with !COMPAT proved quite ugly with all the
> defines. Splitting out the 32bit and 64bit parts looks better.
> 

BTW the powerpc callchain.c does not match any of the patterns of PERF
CORE in MAINTAINERS (unlike callchain implementation on other
platforms). Is that intentional?

Thanks

Michal