Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Sun, 1 Sep 2019 04:05:14 +0100
From:   Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
To:     Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@aol.com>
Cc:     Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
        Valdis =?utf-8?Q?Kl=C4=93tnieks?= <valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@microsoft.com>,
        linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/staging/exfat - by default, prohibit mount of
 fat/vfat
Message-ID: <20190901030514.GC1131@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
References: <245727.1567183359@turing-police>
 <20190830164503.GA12978@infradead.org>
 <267691.1567212516@turing-police>
 <20190831064616.GA13286@infradead.org>
 <295233.1567247121@turing-police>
 <20190901010721.GG7777@dread.disaster.area>
 <20190901013715.GA8243@hsiangkao-HP-ZHAN-66-Pro-G1>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190901013715.GA8243@hsiangkao-HP-ZHAN-66-Pro-G1>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.0 (2019-05-25)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, Sep 01, 2019 at 09:37:19AM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote:

> fs/orangefs/file.c
>  19 static int flush_racache(struct inode *inode)

Just why the hell would _that_ one be a problem?  It's static in
file; it can't pollute the namespace even if linked into the
kernel.

Folks, let's keep at least some degree of sanity - this is sinking
to the level of certain killfile denizens...