Received: by 2002:a25:c593:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id v141csp87513ybe; Sun, 1 Sep 2019 21:03:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqza5j5QA2VWeG3BoWrYj+qevFWe6D3kfP46C6zxwLhcjq+P8MVPS0qxO0XOBLC2ULzcE1cr X-Received: by 2002:a62:c141:: with SMTP id i62mr10436809pfg.64.1567397019836; Sun, 01 Sep 2019 21:03:39 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1567397019; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=SoWzX/FrIliYkSwxxEw3/XWoCSKHRlk83MVKYWvZavm1iF7a0T0b37QhKQi+8gZji/ d/jTotU9ZDsARt+K3ynC8uYTIcaTjPohP5jvaZ3P5DmqH+rfZJWoGMh+E7MCzzhM6a7q 1Ehkw5+CcmMB6+aoo8RjH/skoLpBAmh/5QtE7iurrd1gfiENJRoiKW+3q3tgDTKsy1+d VekW8WgTqkN46xscqXaVPYaU/T3PnP8rZWNvskhzme+uORgwhkWzvwKRUTwufvNvypXv qe3uDe9x7Sf4FakglUSMAwpfb/gzu7QPyhGg4uqz9DNM8PgD0bz1fVqjA7DzMlUu+uJa +nFA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from; bh=GHbUxmp1UHFvJMH0lHD31lOANpR99pmPJrG3qn4lZBs=; b=pW0ObaKlK8JZvdVUeq9nMLsWT5UgREstMbnI6tJl5mR+/sXqI0EqOSjlyi/v35gyam 0D2BN5FOavJrF9wJCm9A9w1KtpFnSspM2kIT4qBcl3NkTqAauahKQHpbRObkIJwssUKh INHiY3P6B5cotf/7i7G/35woSmLDA5J9hVUXI4vaxOLDUTwQ3y7zdkUN0Cx2DKPZE9gX LGDf5hT+3abl9HwQdxKesNQL/PlMumlIFEbu9Jfqa5VQXaW6C4itlvcJaoojJFMdwBnt PYNh5bmdWO5YgMDsVfhQ7o5h+9671gV7EXcF3VYmZwzLrL8KMtqoPNnfNSQw/P/NYSWq ZLNA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id j4si11004583pff.230.2019.09.01.21.03.24; Sun, 01 Sep 2019 21:03:39 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726027AbfIBEBW (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 2 Sep 2019 00:01:22 -0400 Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org ([203.11.71.1]:57833 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725681AbfIBEBV (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Sep 2019 00:01:21 -0400 Received: from authenticated.ozlabs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 46MGbf204Zz9sDQ; Mon, 2 Sep 2019 14:01:18 +1000 (AEST) From: Michael Ellerman To: Michal Suchanek , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Cc: Michal Suchanek , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , Alexander Viro , Nicholas Piggin , Christophe Leroy , Breno Leitao , Arnd Bergmann , Heiko Carstens , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Firoz Khan , Thomas Gleixner , Joel Stanley , Hari Bathini , Michael Neuling , Andrew Donnellan , Russell Currey , Diana Craciun , "Eric W. Biederman" , David Hildenbrand , Allison Randal , Andrew Morton , Madhavan Srinivasan , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/6] powerpc/perf: consolidate read_user_stack_32 In-Reply-To: <87a7bntkum.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> References: <87a7bntkum.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2019 14:01:17 +1000 Message-ID: <877e6rtkhe.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Michael Ellerman writes: > Michal Suchanek writes: ... >> @@ -295,6 +279,12 @@ static inline int current_is_64bit(void) >> } >> >> #else /* CONFIG_PPC64 */ >> +static int read_user_stack_slow(void __user *ptr, void *buf, int nb) >> +{ >> + return 0; >> +} >> +#endif /* CONFIG_PPC64 */ > > Ending the PPC64 else case here, and then restarting it below with an > ifndef means we end up with two parts of the file that define 32-bit > code, with a common chunk in the middle, which I dislike. > > I'd rather you add the empty read_user_stack_slow() in the existing > #else section and then move read_user_stack_32() below the whole ifdef > PPC64/else/endif section. > > Is there some reason that doesn't work? Gah, I missed that you split the whole file later in the series. Any reason you did it in two steps rather than moving patch 6 earlier in the series? cheers