Received: by 2002:a25:c593:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id v141csp340958ybe; Mon, 2 Sep 2019 02:28:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxhqQXGhDUjb1r7sVtGLWd4pFPMAuP2InnzeX6xwJM1Q/HRGY+ezieb8vgDkficYWW79C+s X-Received: by 2002:a63:b919:: with SMTP id z25mr24086020pge.201.1567416487514; Mon, 02 Sep 2019 02:28:07 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1567416487; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=R+ZbOmex67TY1Eh9BFpty4RKXDUJbNoHCoap7gSUZYTMBeGsTLjQuVi7WZZeYH3Jrl zgdAcVdimjh7VzRj55K8FZbh2dMbH3fJpp/JrAxwrdTL5pOEeVuK/jSyxalUO2RwYwyU bnqng6sLHy6bozkZLP/CaRpzOBSUGgivEUjjFRmKO6B6Dhzk7P4X/IgjML7qJcHIUees npn8wXDCLaayLvaytQLtKDtqQ8I7FpQ1IVBu0315wrSv/pwQxI8Ct7OsNwRoyzFzjvqS BTc36cN3PI0CnY8zcWnyC3vBlMFyhvxMl43oN5ejuFH7ygO9zhWmRkPrMv8SF8kcm3dl 0grA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=I9iJx570KSHxvBkjRPNugyWjA6RciH+09xCfZaHiGJQ=; b=PhLCQdxPMmFBfvepVbIo7cCJM59gZ65yw5swZ0HM1U7UW1KkCQu6vNlPEgSMimVF9N I1l7FZhQ3hVPrcngPjZX9e6clxwetcgu75fPrGjWIel8a/1WKs+KaqwvjPccj5kKnopj gRRFF17yIMG+KBkepq8akaDUvm5Bm33U/dU4Zhloj8AFsmIl233ZZwDzYsIfxdKzByXC pqgH+9soOm4+OqsmwCxotRehda1brZeNDcqRkUSHHQtMAo5OZkjjQCiYWkOIdeBPnPKb EI0QA2h97Gxo/Nn8bGtcqhLW/MzgPVfdn3X+q3GKp+oBoEdPSIQFH4WagPScxJq3874Z K3bg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id y3si9369512pfe.179.2019.09.02.02.27.52; Mon, 02 Sep 2019 02:28:07 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729912AbfIBI07 (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 2 Sep 2019 04:26:59 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:53910 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729382AbfIBI06 (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Sep 2019 04:26:58 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF187AF0D; Mon, 2 Sep 2019 08:26:56 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2019 10:26:53 +0200 From: Michal =?UTF-8?B?U3VjaMOhbmVr?= To: Michael Ellerman Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Madhavan Srinivasan , David Hildenbrand , Heiko Carstens , Paul Mackerras , Breno Leitao , Michael Neuling , Diana Craciun , Firoz Khan , Hari Bathini , Joel Stanley , Arnd Bergmann , Nicholas Piggin , Alexander Viro , Thomas Gleixner , Allison Randal , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Eric W. Biederman" , Andrew Donnellan , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/6] powerpc/perf: consolidate read_user_stack_32 Message-ID: <20190902102653.6d477e16@naga> In-Reply-To: <877e6rtkhe.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> References: <87a7bntkum.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> <877e6rtkhe.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.4 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-suse-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 02 Sep 2019 14:01:17 +1000 Michael Ellerman wrote: > Michael Ellerman writes: > > Michal Suchanek writes: > ... > >> @@ -295,6 +279,12 @@ static inline int current_is_64bit(void) > >> } > >> > >> #else /* CONFIG_PPC64 */ > >> +static int read_user_stack_slow(void __user *ptr, void *buf, int nb) > >> +{ > >> + return 0; > >> +} > >> +#endif /* CONFIG_PPC64 */ > > > > Ending the PPC64 else case here, and then restarting it below with an > > ifndef means we end up with two parts of the file that define 32-bit > > code, with a common chunk in the middle, which I dislike. > > > > I'd rather you add the empty read_user_stack_slow() in the existing > > #else section and then move read_user_stack_32() below the whole ifdef > > PPC64/else/endif section. > > > > Is there some reason that doesn't work? > > Gah, I missed that you split the whole file later in the series. Any > reason you did it in two steps rather than moving patch 6 earlier in the > series? To make this patch readable. Thanks Michal