Received: by 2002:a25:c593:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id v141csp1209951ybe; Mon, 2 Sep 2019 16:46:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx6Ei2kh9kZuSs/gQsRygK/jA2NOZBm5246ut8Q4aINJm1NL9AXQfyCDwUkF/ZFzmk3qDjk X-Received: by 2002:a63:c84d:: with SMTP id l13mr27350162pgi.154.1567467983357; Mon, 02 Sep 2019 16:46:23 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1567467983; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=dwtZDj/zRhhtijlIxSEZrPGY8gj7Rygkw80jGLeaaEmHAxCQ0DAlJmI5lQHdysy3y1 mu7SwDSI4mVAICIm2/e+oDtMLYlo392UJfacSqbL+Lv2I9/t45FmLe0YR7VssUPsIZLl NtuUdSMvxIlUfkDECTl2OJliE1Dl7eRrLB8BpgDl55W3/EeTXLd5+v8n+adaZJrfW9Bp tlHK5znbogP+7FxILGlDcF0hREAMtWDux8+hy47ev7NovCvN12UH1E94GJjXZHEEk8hD lWldt+ttNHAiWxw2pvkc1DgC/bv3YyhSWCu0OjmYjHDcjkKyxq2BnQCvKQlwLNNjwcWK xOng== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :message-id:date:references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from; bh=/sv4VExhOTvMS+zKcFv3GTyZrQPpqLnAr3QR3IQFtWU=; b=MItJi5P5J7ZRRQzyM6t8M4bqO0vsYNIyk7IWO42+MegJAAuGjEbHdbSTu2I++dU/9L mDWVz4nznWb9vzSWwSklUgHjPfmrTnThrtha0t/Olg8e5L02VTtuCp9ZvM7KnoKuX/A6 ipg0dkpZuyI+Nu/1enWXDxHooAnga3kBNFrKht+clQg/4xBTs0QK+vNkHSyLph+dNgmD D5yf4Dosh6Nofy3BYb01pYZYNJ2iMPcMYBOsC8BrOhsBhuPrA3oVgfO2lLFOrR35IDXM vpn4PRV5S0dDPxtx0jpOqm0NuYFgMFYIWXtbGFAu3fBy9Gb85Ic1UWqklVeAZhX21dm4 bf/w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l65si13017678plb.312.2019.09.02.16.46.06; Mon, 02 Sep 2019 16:46:23 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727916AbfIBXpO convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 2 Sep 2019 19:45:14 -0400 Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.11.71.1]:55925 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726849AbfIBXpO (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Sep 2019 19:45:14 -0400 Received: from authenticated.ozlabs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 46Mmsb27qjz9s7T; Tue, 3 Sep 2019 09:45:07 +1000 (AEST) From: Michael Ellerman To: Michal =?utf-8?Q?Such=C3=A1nek?= Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Madhavan Srinivasan , David Hildenbrand , Heiko Carstens , Paul Mackerras , Breno Leitao , Michael Neuling , Diana Craciun , Firoz Khan , Hari Bathini , Joel Stanley , Arnd Bergmann , Nicholas Piggin , Alexander Viro , Thomas Gleixner , Allison Randal , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Eric W. Biederman" , Andrew Donnellan , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/6] powerpc/perf: consolidate read_user_stack_32 In-Reply-To: <20190902102653.6d477e16@naga> References: <87a7bntkum.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> <877e6rtkhe.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> <20190902102653.6d477e16@naga> Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2019 09:45:05 +1000 Message-ID: <87mufms1oe.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Michal Suchánek writes: > On Mon, 02 Sep 2019 14:01:17 +1000 > Michael Ellerman wrote: >> Michael Ellerman writes: >> > Michal Suchanek writes: >> ... >> >> @@ -295,6 +279,12 @@ static inline int current_is_64bit(void) >> >> } >> >> >> >> #else /* CONFIG_PPC64 */ >> >> +static int read_user_stack_slow(void __user *ptr, void *buf, int nb) >> >> +{ >> >> + return 0; >> >> +} >> >> +#endif /* CONFIG_PPC64 */ >> > >> > Ending the PPC64 else case here, and then restarting it below with an >> > ifndef means we end up with two parts of the file that define 32-bit >> > code, with a common chunk in the middle, which I dislike. >> > >> > I'd rather you add the empty read_user_stack_slow() in the existing >> > #else section and then move read_user_stack_32() below the whole ifdef >> > PPC64/else/endif section. >> > >> > Is there some reason that doesn't work? >> >> Gah, I missed that you split the whole file later in the series. Any >> reason you did it in two steps rather than moving patch 6 earlier in the >> series? > > To make this patch readable. But it's not very readable :) You also retained the comment about the 32-bit behaviour which is now a bit confusing, because the function is used on both 32 & 64-bit. I think moving it as I suggested in my first reply makes for a better diff, something like eg: diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/callchain.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/callchain.c index c84bbd4298a0..82c0f81b89a5 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/callchain.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/callchain.c @@ -165,22 +165,6 @@ static int read_user_stack_64(unsigned long __user *ptr, unsigned long *ret) return read_user_stack_slow(ptr, ret, 8); } -static int read_user_stack_32(unsigned int __user *ptr, unsigned int *ret) -{ - if ((unsigned long)ptr > TASK_SIZE - sizeof(unsigned int) || - ((unsigned long)ptr & 3)) - return -EFAULT; - - pagefault_disable(); - if (!__get_user_inatomic(*ret, ptr)) { - pagefault_enable(); - return 0; - } - pagefault_enable(); - - return read_user_stack_slow(ptr, ret, 4); -} - static inline int valid_user_sp(unsigned long sp, int is_64) { if (!sp || (sp & 7) || sp > (is_64 ? TASK_SIZE : 0x100000000UL) - 32) @@ -295,27 +279,6 @@ static inline int current_is_64bit(void) } #else /* CONFIG_PPC64 */ -/* - * On 32-bit we just access the address and let hash_page create a - * HPTE if necessary, so there is no need to fall back to reading - * the page tables. Since this is called at interrupt level, - * do_page_fault() won't treat a DSI as a page fault. - */ -static int read_user_stack_32(unsigned int __user *ptr, unsigned int *ret) -{ - int rc; - - if ((unsigned long)ptr > TASK_SIZE - sizeof(unsigned int) || - ((unsigned long)ptr & 3)) - return -EFAULT; - - pagefault_disable(); - rc = __get_user_inatomic(*ret, ptr); - pagefault_enable(); - - return rc; -} - static inline void perf_callchain_user_64(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *entry, struct pt_regs *regs) { @@ -333,6 +296,11 @@ static inline int valid_user_sp(unsigned long sp, int is_64) return 1; } +static int read_user_stack_slow(void __user *ptr, void *buf, int nb) +{ + return 0; +} + #define __SIGNAL_FRAMESIZE32 __SIGNAL_FRAMESIZE #define sigcontext32 sigcontext #define mcontext32 mcontext @@ -341,6 +309,33 @@ static inline int valid_user_sp(unsigned long sp, int is_64) #endif /* CONFIG_PPC64 */ +static int read_user_stack_32(unsigned int __user *ptr, unsigned int *ret) +{ + int rc; + + if ((unsigned long)ptr > TASK_SIZE - sizeof(unsigned int) || + ((unsigned long)ptr & 3)) + return -EFAULT; + + pagefault_disable(); + rc = __get_user_inatomic(*ret, ptr); + pagefault_enable(); + + /* + * On 32-bit we just access the address and let hash_page() create a + * HPTE if necessary, so there is no need to fall back to reading the + * page tables. Since this is called at interrupt level, do_page_fault() + * won't treat a DSI as a page fault. + * + * On 64-bit if the access faults we fall back to + * read_user_stack_slow(), see the comment there for more details. + */ + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC64) && rc) + return read_user_stack_slow(ptr, ret, 4); + + return rc; +} + /* * Layout for non-RT signal frames */ cheers