Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <F7CD281DE3E379468C6D07993EA72F84D18A5786@RTITMBSVM04.realtek.com.tw>
 <20190826070827.1436-1-jian-hong@endlessm.com> <F7CD281DE3E379468C6D07993EA72F84D18AE2DA@RTITMBSVM04.realtek.com.tw>
 <875zmarivz.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com>
In-Reply-To: <875zmarivz.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com>
From:   Jian-Hong Pan <jian-hong@endlessm.com>
Date:   Tue, 3 Sep 2019 10:45:50 +0800
Message-ID: <CAPpJ_efAxQN4pRdpVmT5Pdkp-6Y-QVOQdJR4iY4A-PXZokLGtA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] rtw88: pci: Move a mass of jobs in hw IRQ to soft IRQ
To:     Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Cc:     Tony Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
        "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux@endlessm.com" <linux@endlessm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> =E6=96=BC 2019=E5=B9=B49=E6=9C=882=E6=97=
=A5 =E9=80=B1=E4=B8=80 =E4=B8=8B=E5=8D=888:18=E5=AF=AB=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A
>
> Tony Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com> writes:
>
> >> From: Jian-Hong Pan
> >> Subject: [PATCH v4] rtw88: pci: Move a mass of jobs in hw IRQ to soft =
IRQ
> >>
> >> There is a mass of jobs between spin lock and unlock in the hardware
> >> IRQ which will occupy much time originally. To make system work more
> >> efficiently, this patch moves the jobs to the soft IRQ (bottom half) t=
o
> >> reduce the time in hardware IRQ.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jian-Hong Pan <jian-hong@endlessm.com>
> >
> > Now it works fine with MSI interrupt enabled.
> >
> > But this patch is conflicting with MSI interrupt patch.
> > Is there a better way we can make Kalle apply them more smoothly?
> > I can rebase them and submit both if you're OK.

The rebase work is appreciated.

Thank you,
Jian-Hong Pan

> Yeah, submitting all the MSI patches in the same patchset is the easiest
> approach. That way they apply cleanly to wireless-drivers-next.
>
> --
> https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpa=
tches