Received: by 2002:a25:c593:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id v141csp1713431ybe; Tue, 3 Sep 2019 02:21:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyIqzaIc3UbRvgmTPe17GFRWMmmLOp4jnH+1pFJ2HwlhHzi+NJBIw1qbUSjOBlb5HFD/i03 X-Received: by 2002:a63:5765:: with SMTP id h37mr28581755pgm.183.1567502470318; Tue, 03 Sep 2019 02:21:10 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1567502470; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=fEaKoObaxhtxD/0c4G6f1txkxHSSt5heJ6B7Ul7O4ICHFDDMlHXY2Kj1sp08iRJd5z 40N55Z56CZvRaoan0U/On7kBELmMUkGa8OQvnemIVImNTNIjmiIqD4D5mlDcj8536CW+ wmhPma9DhZ0jH18lPupWeBoW5IS8zSmTe+IWpTqxNxDQ4IvxIBFUhxoyztx8LqA6d4Qe OHpRiytg5D5kQYIJP9ESNMpaSJORbuQSgHO46r/wNXF/5VaCPq1bRCskyWJYGa3gL2nI Utl6AWNJngZ6Jwuf6dovjvxuE2wRO6N+Sr/cLBlD9ixB1eqWs7W0HmtkN4iqbPB+SfQW 3MAg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=a+nfKLi2he9bLdk2LnaE9QzeXyuYoa5Ggy2DAt4Lvw8=; b=Fhof1fbmCi6RbDoZYy9yq+tpYaeQQNscWUKEk3zT7PO+XN4obZWU0VwRo8baF1ZebX OrWaiOK4/4UH6qJ5kPvJKIfxl5RfdkgNg/M6DTG1McvhboSkDlS7QcN7cyQjrHNpgBPM YD3XnG//ArcKOAuRV5R3FnhIRIlygNhvAamsw02h770gVl6ee+RDheRfbY5OyEGiHZp/ Xpp5iG5kzvVKhEnfxYuSRkiH9v52VgX2GlK2UNdi4KYQjBMUkpBD2ylM2wEn1aOaXcDE tQjk5rTGzxY4aITxhGtU+dTCdEERn2jgprjWhXt2gELz4qyi4XK77fUU1TEt1Ysug0Ih za1g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=MtriW0JW; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id e24si5786478pjp.51.2019.09.03.02.20.54; Tue, 03 Sep 2019 02:21:10 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=MtriW0JW; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728552AbfICJTc (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 3 Sep 2019 05:19:32 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:47780 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728319AbfICJTc (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Sep 2019 05:19:32 -0400 Received: from mail-qk1-f179.google.com (mail-qk1-f179.google.com [209.85.222.179]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B2A2B2077B; Tue, 3 Sep 2019 09:19:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1567502370; bh=Qnen7BxG+rvI3ZvNhgI2pciifS1DOuQEw8FOLb60nAs=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:From; b=MtriW0JWoXsYW3PWjukrGesB6K472bTvhGcRD3XXQYq9jJ+FCYl7gAzP4uOZS3Ztt LNCSRFVIUYjnPlgv9tUKdNygw66/wjuy51xYKR6y/kkJaltsZU89ye4J4zBSHNBHWr heteGWfiVkxWyvODH0x0pitgOgCFUUCWvYdKf+Js= Received: by mail-qk1-f179.google.com with SMTP id 4so15093664qki.6; Tue, 03 Sep 2019 02:19:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAX8iBwQGhczVlY6b/KlBfjwr4QKlQEeWfTk8r+x1KEibJxSbvNJ 9S4HiVgOF5FkijZRJcPnrlJXsPSHVHtgLdiOAQ== X-Received: by 2002:a37:682:: with SMTP id 124mr31949831qkg.393.1567502369930; Tue, 03 Sep 2019 02:19:29 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190828124315.48448-1-vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@linux.intel.com> <20190828124315.48448-2-vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@linux.intel.com> <20190902033716.GA18092@bogus> <9f4d6bdd-072a-ab71-1ef1-1d00c22bd064@linux.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <9f4d6bdd-072a-ab71-1ef1-1d00c22bd064@linux.intel.com> From: Rob Herring Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2019 10:19:18 +0100 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: phy: intel-sdxc-phy: Add YAML schema for LGM SDXC PHY To: "Ramuthevar, Vadivel MuruganX" Cc: Kishon Vijay Abraham I , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Andy Shevchenko , cheol.yong.kim@intel.com, qi-ming.wu@intel.com, peter.harliman.liem@intel.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 2:57 AM Ramuthevar, Vadivel MuruganX wrote: > > Hi Rob, > > Thank you for review comments. > > On 2/9/2019 9:38 PM, Rob Herring wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 08:43:14PM +0800, Ramuthevar,Vadivel MuruganX wrote: > >> From: Ramuthevar Vadivel Murugan > >> > >> Add a YAML schema to use the host controller driver with the > >> SDXC PHY on Intel's Lightning Mountain SoC. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Ramuthevar Vadivel Murugan > >> --- > >> .../bindings/phy/intel,lgm-sdxc-phy.yaml | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > >> .../devicetree/bindings/phy/intel,syscon.yaml | 33 ++++++++++++++ > >> 2 files changed, 85 insertions(+) > >> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/intel,lgm-sdxc-phy.yaml > >> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/intel,syscon.yaml > >> > >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/intel,lgm-sdxc-phy.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/intel,lgm-sdxc-phy.yaml > >> new file mode 100644 > >> index 000000000000..99647207b414 > >> --- /dev/null > >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/intel,lgm-sdxc-phy.yaml > >> @@ -0,0 +1,52 @@ > >> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause) > >> +%YAML 1.2 > >> +--- > >> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/phy/intel,lgm-sdxc-phy.yaml# > >> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# > >> + > >> +title: Intel Lightning Mountain(LGM) SDXC PHY Device Tree Bindings > >> + > >> +maintainers: > >> + - Ramuthevar Vadivel Murugan > >> + > >> +allOf: > >> + - $ref: "intel,syscon.yaml" > > You don't need this. It should be selected and applied by the compatible > > string matching. > Agreed, fix it in the next patch. > >> + > >> +description: Binding for SDXC PHY > >> + > >> +properties: > >> + compatible: > >> + const: intel,lgm-sdxc-phy > >> + > >> + intel,syscon: > >> + description: phandle to the sdxc through syscon > >> + > >> + clocks: > >> + maxItems: 1 > >> + > >> + clock-names: > >> + maxItems: 1 > >> + > >> + "#phy-cells": > >> + const: 0 > >> + > >> +required: > >> + - "#phy-cells" > >> + - compatible > >> + - intel,syscon > >> + - clocks > >> + - clock-names > >> + > >> +additionalProperties: false > >> + > >> +examples: > >> + - | > >> + sdxc_phy: sdxc_phy { > >> + compatible = "intel,lgm-sdxc-phy"; > >> + intel,syscon = <&sysconf>; > > Make this a child of the below node and then you don't need this. > > > > If there's a register address range associated with this, then add a reg > > property. > > Thanks for comments, I have defined herewith example > > sysconf: chiptop@e0020000 { > compatible = "intel,syscon"; Needs to be SoC specific value. > reg = <0xe0020000 0x100>; > > emmc_phy: emmc_phy { > compatible = "intel,lgm-emmc-phy"; > intel,syscon = <&sysconf>; This is redundant because you can just get the parent node. If there's a defined register range within the 'intel,syscon' block then define it here with 'reg'. > clocks = <&emmc>; > clock-names = "emmcclk"; > #phy-cells = <0>; > }; > }; > > Is this way need to add right? > > >> + clocks = <&sdxc>; > >> + clock-names = "sdxcclk"; > >> + #phy-cells = <0>; > >> + }; > >> + > >> +...