Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Tue, 3 Sep 2019 10:12:16 -0400
From:   "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To:     Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Cc:     Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
        Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
        virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
        linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        virtio-fs@redhat.com, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
        "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/13] virtio-fs: shared file system for virtual
 machines
Message-ID: <20190903101001-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
References: <20190821173742.24574-1-vgoyal@redhat.com>
 <CAJfpegvPTxkaNhXWhiQSprSJqyW1cLXeZEz6x_f0PxCd-yzHQg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20190903041507-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
 <20190903140752.GA10983@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190903140752.GA10983@redhat.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 10:07:52AM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 04:31:38AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> 
> [..]
> > +	/* TODO lock */
> > give me pause.
> > 
> > Cleanup generally seems broken to me - what pauses the FS
> 
> I am looking into device removal aspect of it now. Thinking of adding
> a reference count to virtiofs device and possibly also a bit flag to
> indicate if device is still alive. That way, we should be able to cleanup
> device more gracefully.

Generally, the way to cleanup things is to first disconnect device from
linux so linux won't send new requests, wait for old ones to finish.


> > 
> > What about the rest of TODOs in that file?
> 
> I will also take a closer look at TODOs now. Better device cleanup path
> might get rid of some of them. Some of them might not be valid anymore.
> 
> > 
> > use of usleep is hacky - can't we do better e.g. with a
> > completion?
> 
> Agreed.
> 
> Thanks
> Vivek