Received: by 2002:a25:c593:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id v141csp366620ybe; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 00:36:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyXL+rn+X/k6DF934k0C7cgt9nQAIN2/if5R9kX7tudg+3E+YAHqRZO0y5eSPATFPywIa3I X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:b598:: with SMTP id a24mr17848434pls.5.1567582577311; Wed, 04 Sep 2019 00:36:17 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1567582577; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=MVnx8We4ZMkPbdFhTlVLTVezsxlmcKU1pQbdSCBXZJawFVX0uz/Dg3sLNTWAMhE+ri dWmKUltoQAb9VOFxC48B0YPpHa8zgnfxylsYdIGxnDQL9x1coZFiAg14L/KmVpVobA+j LuBFpAHQ0oUig3syKay7QUGj2udJ0+1dGvChJPuUGVOvrv6S0aA6r2334K3jYxLeFGzP 9mIESUtMqQ4oGeLbj5Exoue5Zs7kmeaQls5wYvl33kqnUtqTHa8EU6xdgdvxqiBVtkST yNkOHqDu8OkwaXpS8CmpeLifO2pi4SOKnwmcUVpvdYG2K2mNIXISLvJlPbtpUxAmmlS9 gq6w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:in-reply-to:mime-version :user-agent:date:autocrypt:openpgp:from:references:cc:to:subject; bh=yI7BlEPuhGRh1/VkYd5lECvrWoU0+mXt2C77fnLMdYw=; b=c32o8RoTCwYSAVGxHuBzbu5aionJWJFvMyikH49ifIyk0DbkMEuIX+ME6b9PvRKseX OofyYZbTaZM4AjAfa7+XundkOUYimZjO88fBq7oXMBh1mAi/1k6EPWzfl4SKaW+wjh3U H3879AmEsbNZhUj3PPoRwN9dDgD75K4fuX/pmK2Pydms/3YWDSAA9bZ77/APONOcy0m4 YgBcikM4gsUjzRL182bOORbWhyKCXgN4x1WzZrr8svb1zBMYPHN+///sW54qvimBZBml mZFpNEL9U8SEoD5e6euV+KJVWjvz+5eln3+DoQpj/HpYLJDslNRbcKxh5GSrBrlUKh2y JDig== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id e65si16247375pgc.595.2019.09.04.00.36.00; Wed, 04 Sep 2019 00:36:17 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729126AbfIDHdy (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 4 Sep 2019 03:33:54 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:60310 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728745AbfIDHdy (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Sep 2019 03:33:54 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098404.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x847WV2P015874 for ; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 03:33:53 -0400 Received: from e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.100]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2ut851hqsk-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 04 Sep 2019 03:33:52 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 08:33:50 +0100 Received: from b06avi18878370.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.26.194) by e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.134) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Wed, 4 Sep 2019 08:33:48 +0100 Received: from d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.232]) by b06avi18878370.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x847Xl2v44564858 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 4 Sep 2019 07:33:47 GMT Received: from d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04E5952051; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 07:33:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [9.145.155.72]) by d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 881FA52050; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 07:33:46 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: s390: Disallow invalid bits in kvm_valid_regs and kvm_dirty_regs To: Thomas Huth , kvm@vger.kernel.org, Christian Borntraeger Cc: David Hildenbrand , Cornelia Huck , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20190904071308.25683-1-thuth@redhat.com> From: Janosch Frank Openpgp: preference=signencrypt Autocrypt: addr=frankja@linux.ibm.com; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mQINBFubpD4BEADX0uhkRhkj2AVn7kI4IuPY3A8xKat0ihuPDXbynUC77mNox7yvK3X5QBO6 qLqYr+qrG3buymJJRD9xkp4mqgasHdB5WR9MhXWKH08EvtvAMkEJLnqxgbqf8td3pCQ2cEpv 15mH49iKSmlTcJ+PvJpGZcq/jE42u9/0YFHhozm8GfQdb9SOI/wBSsOqcXcLTUeAvbdqSBZe zuMRBivJQQI1esD9HuADmxdE7c4AeMlap9MvxvUtWk4ZJ/1Z3swMVCGzZb2Xg/9jZpLsyQzb lDbbTlEeyBACeED7DYLZI3d0SFKeJZ1SUyMmSOcr9zeSh4S4h4w8xgDDGmeDVygBQZa1HaoL Esb8Y4avOYIgYDhgkCh0nol7XQ5i/yKLtnNThubAcxNyryw1xSstnKlxPRoxtqTsxMAiSekk 0m3WJwvwd1s878HrQNK0orWd8BzzlSswzjNfQYLF466JOjHPWFOok9pzRs+ucrs6MUwDJj0S cITWU9Rxb04XyigY4XmZ8dywaxwi2ZVTEg+MD+sPmRrTw+5F+sU83cUstuymF3w1GmyofgsU Z+/ldjToHnq21MNa1wx0lCEipCCyE/8K9B9bg9pUwy5lfx7yORP3JuAUfCYb8DVSHWBPHKNj HTOLb2g2UT65AjZEQE95U2AY9iYm5usMqaWD39pAHfhC09/7NQARAQABtCVKYW5vc2NoIEZy YW5rIDxmcmFua2phQGxpbnV4LmlibS5jb20+iQI3BBMBCAAhBQJbm6Q+AhsjBQsJCAcCBhUI CQoLAgQWAgMBAh4BAheAAAoJEONU5rjiOLn4p9gQALjkdj5euJVI2nNT3/IAxAhQSmRhPEt0 AmnCYnuTcHRWPujNr5kqgtyER9+EMQ0ZkX44JU2q7OWxTdSNSAN/5Z7qmOR9JySvDOf4d3mS bMB5zxL9d8SbnSs1uW96H9ZBTlTQnmLfsiM9TetAjSrR8nUmjGhe2YUhJLR1v1LguME+YseT eXnLzIzqqpu311/eYiiIGcmaOjPCE+vFjcXL5oLnGUE73qSYiujwhfPCCUK0850o1fUAYq5p CNBCoKT4OddZR+0itKc/cT6NwEDwdokeg0+rAhxb4Rv5oFO70lziBplEjOxu3dqgIKbHbjza EXTb+mr7VI9O4tTdqrwJo2q9zLqqOfDBi7NDvZFLzaCewhbdEpDYVu6/WxprAY94hY3F4trT rQMHJKQENtF6ZTQc9fcT5I3gAmP+OEvDE5hcTALpWm6Z6SzxO7gEYCnF+qGXqp8sJVrweMub UscyLqHoqdZC2UG4LQ1OJ97nzDpIRe0g6oJ9ZIYHKmfw5jjwH6rASTld5MFWajWdNsqK15k/ RZnHAGICKVIBOBsq26m4EsBlfCdt3b/6emuBjUXR1pyjHMz2awWzCq6/6OWs5eANZ0sdosNq dq2v0ULYTazJz2rlCXV89qRa7ukkNwdBSZNEwsD4eEMicj1LSrqWDZMAALw50L4jxaMD7lPL jJbauQINBFubpD4BEADAcUTRqXF/aY53OSH7IwIK9lFKxIm0IoFkOEh7LMfp7FGzaP7ANrZd cIzhZi38xyOkcaFY+npGEWvko7rlIAn0JpBO4x3hfhmhBD/WSY8LQIFQNNjEm3vzrMo7b9Jb JAqQxfbURY3Dql3GUzeWTG9uaJ00u+EEPlY8zcVShDltIl5PLih20e8xgTnNzx5c110lQSu0 iZv2lAE6DM+2bJQTsMSYiwKlwTuv9LI9Chnoo6+tsN55NqyMxYqJgElk3VzlTXSr3+rtSCwf tq2cinETbzxc1XuhIX6pu/aCGnNfuEkM34b7G1D6CPzDMqokNFbyoO6DQ1+fW6c5gctXg/lZ 602iEl4C4rgcr3+EpfoPUWzKeM8JXv5Kpq4YDxhvbitr8Dm8gr38+UKFZKlWLlwhQ56r/zAU v6LIsm11GmFs2/cmgD1bqBTNHHcTWwWtRTLgmnqJbVisMJuYJt4KNPqphTWsPY8SEtbufIlY HXOJ2lqUzOReTrie2u0qcSvGAbSfec9apTFl2Xko/ddqPcZMpKhBiXmY8tJzSPk3+G4tqur4 6TYAm5ouitJsgAR61Cu7s+PNuq/pTLDhK+6/Njmc94NGBcRA4qTuysEGE79vYWP2oIAU4Fv6 gqaWHZ4MEI2XTqH8wiwzPdCQPYsSE0fXWiYu7ObeErT6iLSTZGx4rQARAQABiQIfBBgBCAAJ BQJbm6Q+AhsMAAoJEONU5rjiOLn4DDEP/RuyckW65SZcPG4cMfNgWxZF8rVjeVl/9PBfy01K 8R0hajU40bWtXSMiby7j0/dMjz99jN6L+AJHJvrLz4qYRzn2Ys843W+RfXj62Zde4YNBE5SL jJweRCbMWKaJLj6499fctxTyeb9+AMLQS4yRSwHuAZLmAb5AyCW1gBcTWZb8ON5BmWnRqeGm IgC1EvCnHy++aBnHTn0m+zV89BhTLTUal35tcjUFwluBY39R2ux/HNlBO1GY3Z+WYXhBvq7q katThLjaQSmnOrMhzqYmdShP1leFTVbzXUUIYv/GbynO/YrL2gaQpaP1bEUEi8lUAfXJbEWG dnHFkciryi092E8/9j89DJg4mmZqOau7TtUxjRMlBcIliXkzSLUk+QvD4LK1kWievJse4mte FBdkWHfP4BH/+8DxapRcG1UAheSnSRQ5LiO50annOB7oXF+vgKIaie2TBfZxQNGAs3RQ+bga DchCqFm5adiSP5+OT4NjkKUeGpBe/aRyQSle/RropTgCi85pje/juYEn2P9UAgkfBJrOHvQ9 Z+2Sva8FRd61NJLkCJ4LFumRn9wQlX2icFbi8UDV3do0hXJRRYTWCxrHscMhkrFWLhYiPF4i phX7UNdOWBQ90qpHyAxHmDazdo27gEjfvsgYMdveKknEOTEb5phwxWgg7BcIDoJf9UMC Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2019 09:33:45 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190904071308.25683-1-thuth@redhat.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="KCJXWAnzrD8uRwAanjK8DKax8UhWoz0bJ" X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19090407-0016-0000-0000-000002A67A96 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19090407-0017-0000-0000-00003306E66B Message-Id: <3b1666ee-0b7f-a775-3622-5ca7f938aeb0@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-09-04_01:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=973 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1906280000 definitions=main-1909040078 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --KCJXWAnzrD8uRwAanjK8DKax8UhWoz0bJ Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="xPn7lGCZnSVGl0FJB37AXdkF6Z4YI95iy"; protected-headers="v1" From: Janosch Frank To: Thomas Huth , kvm@vger.kernel.org, Christian Borntraeger Cc: David Hildenbrand , Cornelia Huck , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <3b1666ee-0b7f-a775-3622-5ca7f938aeb0@linux.ibm.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: s390: Disallow invalid bits in kvm_valid_regs and kvm_dirty_regs References: <20190904071308.25683-1-thuth@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20190904071308.25683-1-thuth@redhat.com> --xPn7lGCZnSVGl0FJB37AXdkF6Z4YI95iy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 9/4/19 9:13 AM, Thomas Huth wrote: > If unknown bits are set in kvm_valid_regs or kvm_dirty_regs, this > clearly indicates that something went wrong in the KVM userspace > application. The x86 variant of KVM already contains a check for > bad bits (and the corresponding kselftest checks this), so let's > do the same on s390x now, too. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth I think it would make sense to split the kvm changes from the test. Reviewed-by: Janosch Frank > --- > arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h | 6 ++++ > arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 4 +++ > .../selftests/kvm/s390x/sync_regs_test.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++= > 3 files changed, 40 insertions(+) >=20 > diff --git a/arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/arch/s390/include/uapi/= asm/kvm.h > index 47104e5b47fd..436ec7636927 100644 > --- a/arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h > +++ b/arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h > @@ -231,6 +231,12 @@ struct kvm_guest_debug_arch { > #define KVM_SYNC_GSCB (1UL << 9) > #define KVM_SYNC_BPBC (1UL << 10) > #define KVM_SYNC_ETOKEN (1UL << 11) > + > +#define KVM_SYNC_S390_VALID_FIELDS \ > + (KVM_SYNC_PREFIX | KVM_SYNC_GPRS | KVM_SYNC_ACRS | KVM_SYNC_CRS | \ > + KVM_SYNC_ARCH0 | KVM_SYNC_PFAULT | KVM_SYNC_VRS | KVM_SYNC_RICCB | \= > + KVM_SYNC_FPRS | KVM_SYNC_GSCB | KVM_SYNC_BPBC | KVM_SYNC_ETOKEN) > + > /* length and alignment of the sdnx as a power of two */ > #define SDNXC 8 > #define SDNXL (1UL << SDNXC) > diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c > index 49d7722229ae..a7d7dedfe527 100644 > --- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c > +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c > @@ -3998,6 +3998,10 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcp= u, struct kvm_run *kvm_run) > if (kvm_run->immediate_exit) > return -EINTR; > =20 > + if (kvm_run->kvm_valid_regs & ~KVM_SYNC_S390_VALID_FIELDS || > + kvm_run->kvm_dirty_regs & ~KVM_SYNC_S390_VALID_FIELDS) > + return -EINVAL; > + > vcpu_load(vcpu); > =20 > if (guestdbg_exit_pending(vcpu)) { > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/sync_regs_test.c b/tools= /testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/sync_regs_test.c > index bbc93094519b..d5290b4ad636 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/sync_regs_test.c > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/sync_regs_test.c > @@ -85,6 +85,36 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) > =20 > run =3D vcpu_state(vm, VCPU_ID); > =20 > + /* Request reading invalid register set from VCPU. */ > + run->kvm_valid_regs =3D INVALID_SYNC_FIELD; > + rv =3D _vcpu_run(vm, VCPU_ID); > + TEST_ASSERT(rv < 0 && errno =3D=3D EINVAL, > + "Invalid kvm_valid_regs did not cause expected KVM_RUN error: %d= \n", > + rv); > + vcpu_state(vm, VCPU_ID)->kvm_valid_regs =3D 0; > + > + run->kvm_valid_regs =3D INVALID_SYNC_FIELD | TEST_SYNC_FIELDS; > + rv =3D _vcpu_run(vm, VCPU_ID); > + TEST_ASSERT(rv < 0 && errno =3D=3D EINVAL, > + "Invalid kvm_valid_regs did not cause expected KVM_RUN error: %d= \n", > + rv); > + vcpu_state(vm, VCPU_ID)->kvm_valid_regs =3D 0; > + > + /* Request setting invalid register set into VCPU. */ > + run->kvm_dirty_regs =3D INVALID_SYNC_FIELD; > + rv =3D _vcpu_run(vm, VCPU_ID); > + TEST_ASSERT(rv < 0 && errno =3D=3D EINVAL, > + "Invalid kvm_dirty_regs did not cause expected KVM_RUN error: %d= \n", > + rv); > + vcpu_state(vm, VCPU_ID)->kvm_dirty_regs =3D 0; > + > + run->kvm_dirty_regs =3D INVALID_SYNC_FIELD | TEST_SYNC_FIELDS; > + rv =3D _vcpu_run(vm, VCPU_ID); > + TEST_ASSERT(rv < 0 && errno =3D=3D EINVAL, > + "Invalid kvm_dirty_regs did not cause expected KVM_RUN error: %d= \n", > + rv); > + vcpu_state(vm, VCPU_ID)->kvm_dirty_regs =3D 0; > + > /* Request and verify all valid register sets. */ > run->kvm_valid_regs =3D TEST_SYNC_FIELDS; > rv =3D _vcpu_run(vm, VCPU_ID); >=20 --xPn7lGCZnSVGl0FJB37AXdkF6Z4YI95iy-- --KCJXWAnzrD8uRwAanjK8DKax8UhWoz0bJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEwGNS88vfc9+v45Yq41TmuOI4ufgFAl1vaNoACgkQ41TmuOI4 ufjW5xAAqrwQio0Wlchvkb6AmqBKX2hwY0bGnw4oALIkbpoEMQIKLp1Ka88r55wt cZAk90yeT7AMHNpeerBsMqkXRn5FhWkCdGGcowmjPNLHImCCwq8YztzNmps+yvxR S25XUoTODXHPXZFVxUyvLsA2wQPuKuo1nt9jvT9Ecbfoi4IFs/Hr/9+cIBWb4Dx4 Cci6QnW/dLpEkgZ195hgZOif+ENGbd7fod5y73zkCI/sVrUPWyhM/di3afS2pDOZ 7+Ckf9ydQDbGP1dfEPK5tsi/bYmKpHHqH5ORhemKJRGgBjaLqEPBq5pzxvYkVM50 TPP3SpukZmDHzFX7VvIWMuGApyxE+IEC3+u2zGBabZTE+hMIAlRDrW6LplmV42dt ZyhPr9tJCYRLiMdzBZLzL1lBPm9EqbBhV47/WM66iu7256ljJ03eN6KeBlBOT8PC KdpR7LmyB5EoNTYMZ6XgBmBefFKb/JTcigTtIaXNXIOrlbVT2kreYpp2KIN/lwif DAFiTJptZX9W+tIBV6A0b9SXQBeovLiDCBjMlSZy08Edm18dr5TVeUbhoQGtpYyY 7/jf6WVewzjn4YO/1hX2a1uL5dkCDLoIhx18IuQ+V7MPlbELoYZQuB7+P074xR7e UiQmR8/qS29kOKEpaMx75rk9N2BRmyahWRjo7mCbjsNC0mB479Q= =bXog -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --KCJXWAnzrD8uRwAanjK8DKax8UhWoz0bJ--