Received: by 2002:a25:c593:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id v141csp673154ybe; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 06:08:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw2QLtHBaOGzsEFnVhmb1ymwqPvBPAkziDAhOkEPF9HhDamp4xSU4GzgRUS7Bzx/g9I85do X-Received: by 2002:aa7:96f3:: with SMTP id i19mr30357596pfq.32.1567602537137; Wed, 04 Sep 2019 06:08:57 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1567602537; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=vzV6pslG9ML2+HNPoXYSDXgr6sbGaNGC9uxm/V84fLVMLkhJ+IhuqZr5NenLBEj0rh 4b4+NROEKJQPhHc3hDGHs1PoUnhbpDrOfi5AZhSgbQiyt4HEQnZVv+7B36M1kBWfcNb0 Az1LOkiwjDSW+c5xvBNn0HARvPDkPfhbVjmOKwbszwl1NLEE4OPib5CNv+OqwmyvOAbw O0JSXAMRdUSdumwkeno7ztiQ7boAMusU0FxmAmF5KvJU+azxOrBUu4qrt01SUTD3qBeR 8hWzKfcFw4x4pTVLU5midxLU6hL5DaVe+ufeXylYGLkU5fjdjHqXG4KmkN4voJtc5YkR nYCQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-language :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:organization:references:cc:to:from:subject :dkim-signature; bh=zFoxQv4DxEhV1HJSsFJxWftx5Co2+yebEq31KECIFEc=; b=sHWANhj/2vmOP8J2UrQwya6V+AOwNQgDkwd7arRi67PAfF1RJD9SKOz/Hu3ycYgLUp PEZ/NTJxfmO0P6Fz1smyfXpe8bHV741WJxB6UFG37grk6ENcPLykS703OJcECLjrKonF 8ML0pyMz2qyI1OUsspAc27gGvxrqlxpF1HnBjAY/TbZHMnW2itrsacQWdRr4q3WUjIDD RuDAfSZz/QABr6ROd9RorQVp5JRWlr3TKo3j0kXybopmUL8r/YMeEYR3pZY1McjFaiyF 9i3ECyCKVhY99rHJzRzb8CB3z/UsiAOVgpgU/iu8rCHONXwh+MiU2n90ie6O6Qr1IdPo V3dA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=fail (test mode) header.i=@shipmail.org header.s=mail header.b=JXsQcDc8; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id bj6si8296246plb.105.2019.09.04.06.08.40; Wed, 04 Sep 2019 06:08:57 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=fail (test mode) header.i=@shipmail.org header.s=mail header.b=JXsQcDc8; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730254AbfIDNGF (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 4 Sep 2019 09:06:05 -0400 Received: from pio-pvt-msa1.bahnhof.se ([79.136.2.40]:54000 "EHLO pio-pvt-msa1.bahnhof.se" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727722AbfIDNGF (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Sep 2019 09:06:05 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pio-pvt-msa1.bahnhof.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id B46D23F9C0; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 15:06:03 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: pio-pvt-msa1.bahnhof.se; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=shipmail.org header.i=@shipmail.org header.b="JXsQcDc8"; dkim-atps=neutral X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at bahnhof.se X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.099 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from pio-pvt-msa1.bahnhof.se ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pio-pvt-msa1.bahnhof.se [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZeLhbXyEuEdk; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 15:05:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail1.shipmail.org (h-205-35.A357.priv.bahnhof.se [155.4.205.35]) (Authenticated sender: mb878879) by pio-pvt-msa1.bahnhof.se (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 746973F54E; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 15:05:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (h-205-35.A357.priv.bahnhof.se [155.4.205.35]) by mail1.shipmail.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8F26E360160; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 15:05:53 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=shipmail.org; s=mail; t=1567602353; bh=rscDBECHNl0CXKODIklLg5/3/ptNV8FCth57CkJf9VI=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=JXsQcDc898Uc90ArEPBLYz3yNnWhJDj0ppW4tgz92O7uS2UUd7RFH5AMPSwri9Zh/ OeCGJr+V1oNeBOv/2nF7E0NAx3y5IdZC6UVYSdQceC9k4nij0GxDwcL5/Js2ivJYNR MDVrK0X2SVKRTBE1ieGdl56nbwfyQ1/zz03BaIl0= Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] drm/ttm, drm/vmwgfx: Correctly support support AMD memory encryption From: =?UTF-8?Q?Thomas_Hellstr=c3=b6m_=28VMware=29?= To: "Koenig, Christian" , Dave Hansen , Daniel Vetter Cc: dri-devel , "pv-drivers@vmware.com" , VMware Graphics , Linux Kernel Mailing List , "Lendacky, Thomas" , Thomas Hellstrom , Peter Zijlstra , Dave Hansen , Heiko Carstens , Christian Borntraeger , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Andy Lutomirski , "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner References: <20190903131504.18935-1-thomas_os@shipmail.org> <20190903131504.18935-4-thomas_os@shipmail.org> <6d0fafcc-b596-481b-7b22-1f26f0c02c5c@intel.com> <7fa3b178-b9b4-2df9-1eee-54e24d48342e@intel.com> <94113acc-1f99-2386-1d42-4b9930b04f73@shipmail.org> <7eec2c11-d0d4-4c81-6ed2-d0932bf5af33@amd.com> <9ca29de8-0c9b-65b2-52e8-8668a1517ac5@shipmail.org> Organization: VMware Inc. Message-ID: Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2019 15:05:53 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <9ca29de8-0c9b-65b2-52e8-8668a1517ac5@shipmail.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 9/4/19 2:35 PM, Thomas Hellström (VMware) wrote: > >> >> I've already talked with Christoph that we probably want to switch TTM >> over to using that instead to also get rid of the ttm_io_prot() hack. > > OK, would that mean us ditching other memory modes completely? And > on-the-fly caching transitions? or is it just for the special case of > cached coherent memory? Do we need to cache the coherent kernel > mappings in TTM as well, for ttm_bo_kmap()? Reading this again, I wanted to point out that I'm not against this. Just curious. /Thomas