Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Wed, 4 Sep 2019 17:42:15 +0200
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To:     Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>,
        Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>,
        Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
        "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
        Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>,
        Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvme-core: Fix subsystem instance mismatches
Message-ID: <20190904154215.GA20422@lst.de>
References: <20190831000139.7662-1-logang@deltatee.com> <20190831152910.GA29439@localhost.localdomain> <33af4d94-9f6d-9baa-01fa-0f75ccee263e@deltatee.com> <20190903164620.GA20847@localhost.localdomain> <20190904060558.GA10849@lst.de> <20190904144426.GB21302@localhost.localdomain>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190904144426.GB21302@localhost.localdomain>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Sep 04, 2019 at 08:44:27AM -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
> Let me step through an example:
> 
>   Ctrl A gets instance 0.
> 
>   Its subsystem gets the same instance, and takes ref count on it:
>   all namespaces in this subsystem will use '0'.
> 
>   Ctrl B gets instance 1, and it's in the same subsystem as Ctrl A so
>   no new subsytem is allocated.
> 
>   Ctrl A is disconnected, dropping its ref on instance 0, but the
>   subsystem still has its refcount, making it unavailable.
> 
>   Ctrl A is reconnected, and allocates instance 2 because 0 is still in
>   use.
> 
> Now all the namespaces in this subsystem are prefixed with nvme0, but no
> controller exists with the same prefix. We still have inevitable naming
> mismatch, right?

I think th major confusion was that we can use the same handle for
and unrelated subsystem vs controller, and that would avoid it.

I don't see how we can avoid the controller is entirely different
from namespace problem ever.