Message-ID: <43AAB3C8.DB304856@tv-sign.ru>
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 17:10:16 +0300
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com>
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, tglx@linutronix.de, inaky.perez-gonzalez@intel.com,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/02] RT: plist namespace cleanup
References: <1135202230.22970.15.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 653
Lines: 21

Daniel Walker wrote:
> 
>         Make the plist namespace consistent.

I think plist_head is much better than pl_head.

However I think plist_empty/plist_unhashed is more accurate
than plist_head_empty/plist_node_empty, but I am rather
agnostic to naming.

Ingo, do you have any preferences?

Daniel, it would be great if you can check that kernel/rt.o
was not changed after rename (as it should be).

Oleg.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/