Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932479AbVLVN5U (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Dec 2005 08:57:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932494AbVLVN5U (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Dec 2005 08:57:20 -0500 Received: from emailhub.stusta.mhn.de ([141.84.69.5]:6418 "HELO mailout.stusta.mhn.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S932479AbVLVN5U (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Dec 2005 08:57:20 -0500 Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 14:57:18 +0100 From: Adrian Bunk To: Andrew Morton Cc: torvalds@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe , Herbert Xu , Michael Madore , David Brownell , Greg KH , paulmck@us.ibm.com, Gottfried Haider , luca.risolia@studio.unibo.it, "P. Christeas" Subject: Re: 2.6.15-rc6: known regressions in the kernel Bugzilla Message-ID: <20051222135718.GA27525@stusta.de> References: <20051222011320.GL3917@stusta.de> <20051222005209.0b1b25ca.akpm@osdl.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051222005209.0b1b25ca.akpm@osdl.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3305 Lines: 105 On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 12:52:09AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > > The following bugs in the kernel Bugzilla [1] contain regressions in > > 2.6.15-rc compared to 2.6.14 with patches: > > Thanks for tracking this. Although I fear it won't come to much. People had been complaining about a lack of testing prior to the final release of a kernel. If this was meant serious, we should try hard to fix all regressions reported by people who do test -rc and -git kernels. > non-bugzilla post-2.6.14 bugs which I've squirelled away include: > > > From: Brice Goglin > Subject: Linux 2.6.14: Badness in as-iosched As the subject says, this is not a post-2.6.14 regression. Besides this, Jens (Cc'ed) sent a patch for it: http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/11/20/119 Was there a reason why it wasn't applied? > From: Charles-Edouard Ruault > Subject: [BUG] kernel 2.6.14.2 breaks IPSEC As the subject says, this is not a post-2.6.14 regression. And reading the discussion on netdev, it seems this wasn't ever expected to work without additional netfilter patches. > From: Michael Madore > Subject: USB handoff, irq 193: nobody cared! If this is still present, David should look into it: http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0511.1/2243.html > From: Wu Fengguang > Subject: BUG: spinlock recursion on 2.6.14-mm2 when oprofiling If this affects Linus' tree, a patch for it is in -mm. > From: Miles Lane > Subject: 2.6.15-rc2-git6 + ipw2200 1.0.8 -- Slab corruption As the subject says, this is a problem when using an external version of this driver. > From: "Gottfried Haider" > Subject: [2.6.15-rc2] 8139too probe fails (pci related?) According to the report perhaps not a post-2.6.14 regression. But anyways, this should be better debugged. @Gottfried: Does it work with kernel 2.6.14.4? Does it work with kernel 2.6.15-rc6? If it stil fails, can you send a complete dmesg for 2.6.15-rc6? > From: Steve Work > Subject: Multi-thread corefiles broken since April As the subject says, this is not a post-2.6.14 regression. > From: Diego Calleja > Subject: Oops with w9968cf @Luca, Greg: http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/12/12/91 > From: John Reiser > Subject: control placement of vDSO page This is not a post-2.6.14 regression. > From: "P. Christeas" > Subject: No sound from CX23880 tuner w. 2.6.15-rc5 No answer by the submitter when being asked for more information. > Subject: x86_64 timekeeping buglets > From: Jim Houston Reported against 2.6.13, therefore not a post-2.6.14 regression. cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/