Received: by 2002:a25:c593:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id v141csp976699ybe; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 10:32:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqznDiQ1ytVpzyHA3CCxmrMOzaMsfNO7Q3vwDxkX4aI93UaaCYw9US6YRcPjiA8lWi3QkAGr X-Received: by 2002:a62:b416:: with SMTP id h22mr7888625pfn.180.1567618346857; Wed, 04 Sep 2019 10:32:26 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1567618346; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=wRJHh+RXSSe3B1XzuYilVrRhxMPB0xGplN7f80Nehg6jdppIbHdoDU9YD0iBWQlSnr mQNt9VEt6PDhWTxtRvzxWi31bWWcKedQqzloy7HVr8hbtc0/i2WZzBNtnjOer8VeuYQ8 GWCmTxy2s8LwAiixb96Urpn9PgNSyJwko5n3CANlBcHv/fRoJZv9hDGf639IiFYIS2ib +mYJ/sJbhEqkV5SIlQ+fWqlVvgKwvIMgtf97USyVFSGDHLnKHZfjUsWXQc6d6YChsSgZ RM56vTcc2IkwdBOl6gTLXSNpTeyKlpVPo3TUaHtxNbtNxXd9/V4HNiVQr5+4rrwiE01s wOOA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=vsh43LmBMTIDm6eOyuvc4z7dAvyDF4r1QZqCzSzuG7Q=; b=j9b49P65gVgrqCBydOBsdnoKNX4lugvmVqS5GIRGtcI+mUgwAKRZ1Fnc4kP+KGUulI hLxQcZ5P+OrteTafYiHnfiEhx0/KZQ8i8XE/hvsZZj4MCMqorcRDC9dE0WSKkknKQlm5 fy18Jr8msHWExpUkj80BiCsROvdDiB+jKnuqsZEPGro817iMmOV3JWNudorviVFLJ2XW lrGWjzTG3ej1vg3OY/epA7ovTyCFlkjfYCCNYvLg8IZTVmtCEYl5uQQ96Eo9RAOuTPw1 cIy6ZWTwEyvn7kPFPSo3y70yXNKwBaHZ953QpxykCuuf7wb0Pp/FarXMlqpdsDNTNO0p EgOA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@st.com header.s=STMicroelectronics header.b=SUPC6f7C; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id x10si4596341pln.268.2019.09.04.10.32.10; Wed, 04 Sep 2019 10:32:26 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@st.com header.s=STMicroelectronics header.b=SUPC6f7C; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731841AbfIDRbQ (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 4 Sep 2019 13:31:16 -0400 Received: from mx07-00178001.pphosted.com ([62.209.51.94]:11734 "EHLO mx07-00178001.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730099AbfIDRbP (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Sep 2019 13:31:15 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0046037.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx07-00178001.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id x84HQYBs024035; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 19:30:58 +0200 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=st.com; h=subject : to : cc : references : from : message-id : date : mime-version : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=STMicroelectronics; bh=vsh43LmBMTIDm6eOyuvc4z7dAvyDF4r1QZqCzSzuG7Q=; b=SUPC6f7Cf7kO/BGTncmewkyVgRO6+E7MzkwNUKMsfDJOmgOQ9Oqs4lz0fcB31pBPm+Bb qGn4/2c1TgZ6AdnAWYX/9yzAajXUJFMec9GBIs6hYSlKD/YKO1wJS6j6UEhIE0edJ8Sf 52oVVLCHrJcbOEkhN3UpbIKPNY2HGHT17ZcVCQmcBpZBIic8HBNG8vatVqpOSKfFY0I7 4ijCi/AKLwCzbD2Evosuo0flSKHU5zYRsQ3HsRWpuEE0XreGvRBSlxdvCQUCrm8Wjlcs nO+GUUxEx0+s55WsL4rSuT6kbEYFxjfd27d3qpBQ4x6KxCRla8fPCL5ZMFk/XryMmBB3 2g== Received: from beta.dmz-ap.st.com (beta.dmz-ap.st.com [138.198.100.35]) by mx07-00178001.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2uqenvar2k-1 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 04 Sep 2019 19:30:58 +0200 Received: from euls16034.sgp.st.com (euls16034.sgp.st.com [10.75.44.20]) by beta.dmz-ap.st.com (STMicroelectronics) with ESMTP id 60D7722; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 17:30:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from Webmail-eu.st.com (sfhdag3node1.st.com [10.75.127.7]) by euls16034.sgp.st.com (STMicroelectronics) with ESMTP id 94CEF2D78C4; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 19:30:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [10.48.0.131] (10.75.127.44) by SFHDAG3NODE1.st.com (10.75.127.7) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 19:30:51 +0200 Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] rpmsg: core: add API to get message length To: Suman Anna , Ohad Ben-Cohen , Bjorn Andersson , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Jiri Slaby , xiang xiao , , CC: Fabien DESSENNE , , Alan Cox References: <1567602594-2913-1-git-send-email-arnaud.pouliquen@st.com> <1567602594-2913-2-git-send-email-arnaud.pouliquen@st.com> <704fadc2-3a62-5d23-6959-2495b497b3f9@ti.com> From: Arnaud Pouliquen Message-ID: <399f278a-13a9-7dc8-a232-8b0ac737abdb@st.com> Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2019 19:30:51 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <704fadc2-3a62-5d23-6959-2495b497b3f9@ti.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.75.127.44] X-ClientProxiedBy: SFHDAG8NODE2.st.com (10.75.127.23) To SFHDAG3NODE1.st.com (10.75.127.7) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.70,1.0.8 definitions=2019-09-04_05:2019-09-04,2019-09-04 signatures=0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Suman On 9/4/19 6:36 PM, Suman Anna wrote: > Hi Arnaud, > > On 9/4/19 8:09 AM, Arnaud Pouliquen wrote: >> Return the rpmsg buffer size for sending message, so rpmsg users >> can split a long message in several sub rpmsg buffers. > > Couple more minor comments.. > >> >> Signed-off-by: Arnaud Pouliquen >> --- >> drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_core.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++ >> drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_internal.h | 2 ++ >> drivers/rpmsg/virtio_rpmsg_bus.c | 10 ++++++++++ >> include/linux/rpmsg.h | 10 ++++++++++ >> 4 files changed, 43 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_core.c b/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_core.c >> index e330ec4dfc33..a6ef54c4779a 100644 >> --- a/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_core.c >> +++ b/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_core.c >> @@ -283,6 +283,27 @@ int rpmsg_trysend_offchannel(struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept, u32 src, u32 dst, >> } >> EXPORT_SYMBOL(rpmsg_trysend_offchannel); >> >> +/** >> + * rpmsg_get_mtu() - get maximum transmission buffer size for sending message. >> + * @ept: the rpmsg endpoint >> + * >> + * This function returns maximum buffer size available for a single message. >> + * >> + * Return: the maximum transmission size on success and an appropriate error >> + * value on failure. >> + */ >> + >> +ssize_t rpmsg_get_mtu(struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept) >> +{ >> + if (WARN_ON(!ept)) >> + return -EINVAL; >> + if (!ept->ops->get_mtu) >> + return -ENOTSUPP; >> + >> + return ept->ops->get_mtu(ept); >> +} >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(rpmsg_get_mtu); >> + >> /* >> * match an rpmsg channel with a channel info struct. >> * this is used to make sure we're not creating rpmsg devices for channels >> diff --git a/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_internal.h b/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_internal.h >> index 3fc83cd50e98..12b9e72adc75 100644 >> --- a/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_internal.h >> +++ b/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_internal.h >> @@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ struct rpmsg_device_ops { >> * @trysendto: see @rpmsg_trysendto(), optional >> * @trysend_offchannel: see @rpmsg_trysend_offchannel(), optional >> * @poll: see @rpmsg_poll(), optional >> + * @get_mtu: see @get_mpu(), required > > see @rpmsg_get_mtu(). Isn't this optional atm, since we haven't added > the callback for SMD transport? It is a good point. On one side, if optional, rpmsg_get_mtu returns an error and the rpmsg client has to define a default value, but which one? On the other, if required, i need to implement it for SMD and Glink driver. Calculate the mtu for these implementations does not seems trivial (if possible...). And i don't know how to test dev on these platforms. Any suggestions? Regards Arnaud > >> * >> * Indirection table for the operations that a rpmsg backend should implement. >> * In addition to @destroy_ept, the backend must at least implement @send and >> @@ -66,6 +67,7 @@ struct rpmsg_endpoint_ops { >> void *data, int len); >> __poll_t (*poll)(struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept, struct file *filp, >> poll_table *wait); >> + ssize_t (*get_mtu)(struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept); >> }; >> >> int rpmsg_register_device(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev); >> diff --git a/drivers/rpmsg/virtio_rpmsg_bus.c b/drivers/rpmsg/virtio_rpmsg_bus.c >> index 376ebbf880d6..fab01b67a550 100644 >> --- a/drivers/rpmsg/virtio_rpmsg_bus.c >> +++ b/drivers/rpmsg/virtio_rpmsg_bus.c >> @@ -175,6 +175,7 @@ static int virtio_rpmsg_trysendto(struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept, void *data, >> int len, u32 dst); >> static int virtio_rpmsg_trysend_offchannel(struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept, u32 src, >> u32 dst, void *data, int len); >> +static ssize_t virtio_rpmsg_get_buf_mtu(struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept); >> >> static const struct rpmsg_endpoint_ops virtio_endpoint_ops = { >> .destroy_ept = virtio_rpmsg_destroy_ept, >> @@ -184,6 +185,7 @@ static const struct rpmsg_endpoint_ops virtio_endpoint_ops = { >> .trysend = virtio_rpmsg_trysend, >> .trysendto = virtio_rpmsg_trysendto, >> .trysend_offchannel = virtio_rpmsg_trysend_offchannel, >> + .get_mtu = virtio_rpmsg_get_buf_mtu, >> }; >> >> /** >> @@ -699,6 +701,14 @@ static int virtio_rpmsg_trysend_offchannel(struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept, u32 src, >> return rpmsg_send_offchannel_raw(rpdev, src, dst, data, len, false); >> } >> >> +static ssize_t virtio_rpmsg_get_buf_mtu(struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept) >> +{ >> + struct rpmsg_device *rpdev = ept->rpdev; >> + struct virtio_rpmsg_channel *vch = to_virtio_rpmsg_channel(rpdev); >> + >> + return vch->vrp->buf_size - sizeof(struct rpmsg_hdr); >> +} >> + >> static int rpmsg_recv_single(struct virtproc_info *vrp, struct device *dev, >> struct rpmsg_hdr *msg, unsigned int len) >> { >> diff --git a/include/linux/rpmsg.h b/include/linux/rpmsg.h >> index 9fe156d1c018..9d638bf2bdce 100644 >> --- a/include/linux/rpmsg.h >> +++ b/include/linux/rpmsg.h >> @@ -135,6 +135,8 @@ int rpmsg_trysend_offchannel(struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept, u32 src, u32 dst, >> __poll_t rpmsg_poll(struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept, struct file *filp, >> poll_table *wait); >> >> +ssize_t rpmsg_get_mtu(struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept); >> + >> #else >> >> static inline int register_rpmsg_device(struct rpmsg_device *dev) >> @@ -242,6 +244,14 @@ static inline __poll_t rpmsg_poll(struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept, >> return 0; >> } >> >> +static ssize_t rpmsg_get_mtu(struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept) > > static inline > > regards > Suman > >> +{ >> + /* This shouldn't be possible */ >> + WARN_ON(1); >> + >> + return -ENXIO; >> +} >> + >> #endif /* IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RPMSG) */ >> >> /* use a macro to avoid include chaining to get THIS_MODULE */ >> >