Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030192AbVLVQxG (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Dec 2005 11:53:06 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030195AbVLVQxG (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Dec 2005 11:53:06 -0500 Received: from gateway-1237.mvista.com ([12.44.186.158]:31218 "EHLO hermes.mvista.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030192AbVLVQxE (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Dec 2005 11:53:04 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/02] RT: plist namespace cleanup From: Daniel Walker To: Oleg Nesterov Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, inaky.perez-gonzalez@intel.com, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@elte.hu In-Reply-To: <43AAB3C8.DB304856@tv-sign.ru> References: <1135202230.22970.15.camel@localhost.localdomain> <43AAB3C8.DB304856@tv-sign.ru> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 08:53:01 -0800 Message-Id: <1135270381.3696.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 (2.2.3-2.fc4) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 836 Lines: 26 On Thu, 2005-12-22 at 17:10 +0300, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > Daniel Walker wrote: > > > > Make the plist namespace consistent. > > I think plist_head is much better than pl_head. > > However I think plist_empty/plist_unhashed is more accurate > than plist_head_empty/plist_node_empty, but I am rather > agnostic to naming. unhashed seems very meaningless . We're not hashing anything. > Daniel, it would be great if you can check that kernel/rt.o > was not changed after rename (as it should be). I didn't check, but I made no code changes so it should be any different. Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/